Dear Editor,
Our Jamaican waters are home to thousands of species of marine wildlife, several of which are concentrated amongst our popular tourist beaches. In particular, the multi-coloured tropical fish known as the parrotfish, famous for its beauty and taste, has in recent years come under threat.
Unbeknownst to some, the parrotfish is a remarkable species for two main reasons. The first relates to the species’ economic value as it cleans coral reef to concerns its ability to counteract beach erosion, that has plagued many of our island’s beaches, by utilising its amazing sand excretion skills. Studies have even revealed that some of the Caribbean’s best kept reefs are those inhabited by parrotfish.
For years now, we have entertained the thought of imposing a ban against the capture of the parrotfish, but to date these efforts have yet to materialise. The species is under threat and is at risk of facing extinction.
Whereas fishermen pose a direct threat to the sustainability of the species, we consumers are all equally to blame for its vulnerability. Yes, it may be true that supermarkets and restaurants sell the fish on their shelves and menus, but when all is said and done we are the ones that buy it. The public ought to equally shoulder the responsibility for the exploitation of the parrotfish, as consumers, through their buying power, have the ability to influence the practices of businesses and curb what is unwanted.
We need to do more than pay lip service to the issue, as there has been too much talk and not enough done. I am not by any measure underestimating the difficulty of enforcement and viability of a ban, and questions regarding the livelihood of fishermen do come into play; however, strategies to address these concerns should be met with immediacy.
I commend Rainforest Seafoods on their recent pledge to discontinue their selling of the product and on their initiative taken to invest in the protection of the fish. With a bit of luck, it is hoped that others in the private sector will follow.
Greater support is required from the Jamaica Tourist Board, the respective chambers of commerce and other entities with vested interests in Jamaica’s tourism, which, by right should be more vocal in championing the fight to protect this national treasure. Perhaps with their support, the Government will feel more compelled to impose a ban on the import, harvesting, sale, and consumption of parrotfish. The saying is true, “Action expresses priorities”. However, the price of inaction will be costly if we continue to do nothing about it.
Emma Thompson
Attorney-at-Law
emmat91@gmail.com
Our Jamaican waters are home to thousands of species of marine wildlife, several of which are concentrated amongst our popular tourist beaches. In particular, the multi-coloured tropical fish known as the parrotfish, famous for its beauty and taste, has in recent years come under threat.
Unbeknownst to some, the parrotfish is a remarkable species for two main reasons. The first relates to the species’ economic value as it cleans coral reef to concerns its ability to counteract beach erosion, that has plagued many of our island’s beaches, by utilising its amazing sand excretion skills. Studies have even revealed that some of the Caribbean’s best kept reefs are those inhabited by parrotfish.
For years now, we have entertained the thought of imposing a ban against the capture of the parrotfish, but to date these efforts have yet to materialise. The species is under threat and is at risk of facing extinction.
Whereas fishermen pose a direct threat to the sustainability of the species, we consumers are all equally to blame for its vulnerability. Yes, it may be true that supermarkets and restaurants sell the fish on their shelves and menus, but when all is said and done we are the ones that buy it. The public ought to equally shoulder the responsibility for the exploitation of the parrotfish, as consumers, through their buying power, have the ability to influence the practices of businesses and curb what is unwanted.
We need to do more than pay lip service to the issue, as there has been too much talk and not enough done. I am not by any measure underestimating the difficulty of enforcement and viability of a ban, and questions regarding the livelihood of fishermen do come into play; however, strategies to address these concerns should be met with immediacy.
I commend Rainforest Seafoods on their recent pledge to discontinue their selling of the product and on their initiative taken to invest in the protection of the fish. With a bit of luck, it is hoped that others in the private sector will follow.
Greater support is required from the Jamaica Tourist Board, the respective chambers of commerce and other entities with vested interests in Jamaica’s tourism, which, by right should be more vocal in championing the fight to protect this national treasure. Perhaps with their support, the Government will feel more compelled to impose a ban on the import, harvesting, sale, and consumption of parrotfish. The saying is true, “Action expresses priorities”. However, the price of inaction will be costly if we continue to do nothing about it.
Emma Thompson
Attorney-at-Law
emmat91@gmail.com