Dear Editor,
Given that the former accused in the X6 murder case refused to produce his weapon, the jury was denied access to critical evidence to determine innocence or guilt.
There are reports he may have been so advised by his attorney, but did he not intentionally pervert the course of justice by so doing? A curious thought.
Also, if the police now come in possession of the former accused’s gun, does it make sense to even test it?
Another curious thought: Is there any location, such as a firing range, etc, where guns are known to have been discharged from which bullets or bullet fragments might be found and tested?
Just curious.
Howard Chin
hmc14@cwjamaica.com
Given that the former accused in the X6 murder case refused to produce his weapon, the jury was denied access to critical evidence to determine innocence or guilt.
There are reports he may have been so advised by his attorney, but did he not intentionally pervert the course of justice by so doing? A curious thought.
Also, if the police now come in possession of the former accused’s gun, does it make sense to even test it?
Another curious thought: Is there any location, such as a firing range, etc, where guns are known to have been discharged from which bullets or bullet fragments might be found and tested?
Just curious.
Howard Chin
hmc14@cwjamaica.com