Quantcast
Channel: Jamaica Observer
Viewing all 9214 articles
Browse latest View live

Job quality very important

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

The PNP, led by Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller, as one of its first-year achievements listed the perceived impact of the Jamaica Emergency Employment Programme (JEEP) at about 15,000 jobs (if my figure is out, bear with me).

A rough estimate of time on a JEEP job is in the range of 1.8 to 3.8 days. As such, some who were in the first batch would have been at maximum 3.8 days, three to four months ago or longer; and perhaps have had no job since then, except a bit of "hustling" to "eat a food".

It is not just the number of jobs created that counts; quality matters. The quality of jobs matters not only for the worker who receives fair wages on time, but for all workers and their families. This is because a job is a critical pathway out of poverty for most people.

Jobs that are good for development contribute to fundamental changes in society by raising living standards and improving social cohesion and productivity. Such societies like Jamaica are conducive to a healthy business environment, which in turn creates good jobs.

Internationally, the good job is defined as that which does more to support three fundamental transformations in society:

1. Social cohesion,

2. Living standards, and

3. Productivity.

Can the Hon Derrick Kellier, minister of labour, tell us which of the above three does a JEEP job seriously impact?

Dr Charles Demontaque

Stafford University

c/o 101 Weybrige Road

Addlestone Road, Surrey

United Kingdom

charlesdemontaque@yahoo.co.uk

Job quality very important

-->

Red mud research a breath of fresh air

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Alicia Dunkley's article on the front page of the Daily Observer of Wednesday, January 16, 2013 entitled 'Big $$$ in red mud: Jamaica could earn billions from Japanese firm's research here' is a breath of fresh air, as it reiterates the importance of the role of research to national development.

This is a lesson Jamaica constantly needs to be reminded of, particularly since a similar research project was done in Jamaica over four decades ago involving the Scientific Research Council and the Stanford Research Institute of California.

Commendations are therefore in order for the team of researchers from the Japanese firm Nippon Light Metal Company Limited for their tremendous work, which contradicted the findings of the previous research.

Reporting on the five-year period (1966-1971), Senior Principal Scientific Officer Mr Neville McFarlane of the Scientific Research Council Mineral Resources Division, who was mandated to develop and exploit 'the country's mineral resources', cited among its achievements, work undertaken on "red mud, a by-product of the alumina process, and in collaboration with Stanford Research Institute of California, carried out technical and economic analysis of alternate processes for the separation and recovery of the various components of red mud. It was found that the proposals were uneconomical at that time". (source, Scientific Research Council in Retrospect 1960/79 Achievements. Scientific Research Councils Press 1979, pp 11-12).

The operative term "uneconomical at that time" should have been translated into the pursuit of further research at a later date by the Jamaica Bauxite Institute, which incidentally is just across from the Scientific Research Council at Hope Gardens. The net result is, the red mud research would have died a natural death if fate had not provided the opportunity for the Japanese to intervene.

As the nation looks to see the feasibility of this research, one cannot help wondering how many other research projects are languishing in reports or gathering dust on shelves, waiting to be unearthed.

What then has been the cost to the country in economic terms for the level of such neglect?

Joan Francis

Museum and Heritage Preservation Officer

University of Technology, Jamaica

Red mud research a breath of fresh air

-->

Sampling of Lance Armstrong's doping denials

$
0
0
Before his abrupt U-turn in an interview this week with Oprah Winfrey, Lance Armstrong had, many times and in many forums, consistently denied that he used performance-enhancing drugs. Here is a sample of some of the cyclist's choicest comments on the subject before he finally admitted to doping:

* "Luke's name is Armstrong and people know that name, and when he goes to school I don't want them to say, 'Oh yeah, your dad's the big fake, the doper.' That would just kill me."— In his second autobiography, Every Second Counts, in 2003.

* "I came out of a life-threatening disease. I was on my death bed. You think I'm going to come back into a sport and say, 'OK, OK doctor, give me everything you've got, I just want to go fast?' No way! I would never do that."— Public forum, Aspen, Colorado, 2007.

* "How many times do I have to say it? ... Well, if it can't be any clearer than 'I've never taken drugs'."— Videotaped testimony in lawsuit, 2005.

"I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles."— 2005 Tour de France victory speech, taking aim at "the cynics and the sceptics".

* "There are no secrets. This is a hard sporting event and hard work wins it."— 2005 Tour de France victory speech.

* "Everybody wants to know: what am I on. What am I on? I'm on my bike, busting my ass six hours a day."— commercial for Nike in 2001.

* "We're sick and tired of these allegations and we're going to do everything we can to fight them. They're absolutely untrue."— news conference, 2004.

* "They say, 'This is a new guy in the Tour. It can't be. He must be doped.' It's unfortunate."— TV interview on the way to winning his first Tour, in 1999.

* "You are not worth the chair that you're sitting on."— said to journalist and doping critic Paul Kimmage at 2009 news conference.

* "Do we make mistakes, all of us? Absolutely. As a society, are we supposed to forgive and forget and let people get back to their job? Absolutely."— same news conference, arguing that dopers should get a second chance.

* "At the end of the day, I have nothing to hide."— Associated Press interview, 2009.

* "I have never doped."— on Larry King Live, 2005.

Yesterday, Armstrong said that viewers can judge for themselves how candid he was in his interview with Oprah Winfrey.

"I left it all on the table with her and when it airs the people can decide," he said in a text message to The Associated Press.

The cyclist responded to a report in the New York Daily News, citing an unidentified source, that he was not contrite when he acknowledged during Monday's taping with Winfrey that he used performance-enhancing drugs.

He's also held conversations with US anti-doping officials, touching off speculation that the team leader who demanded loyalty from others soon may face some very tough choices himself: whether to co-operate and name those who aided, knew about or helped cover up a sophisticated doping ring that Armstrong ran on his tour-winning US Postal Service squads.

"I have no idea what the future holds other than me holding my kids," he said.

Armstrong's interview with Winfrey begins airing tonight, but already some people want to hear more — under oath — before he's allowed to compete again in elite triathlons, a sport he returned to after retiring from cycling in 2011. In addition to stripping him of all seven of his Tour de France titles last year, anti-doping officials banned Armstrong for life from sanctioned events.

World Anti-Doping Agency officials said nothing short of "a full confession under oath" would even cause them to reconsider the ban. Although Armstrong admitted to Winfrey on Monday that he used performance-enhancing drugs, David Howman, director general of the World Anti-Doping Agency, said that is "hardly the same as giving evidence to a relevant authority".

The International Cycling Union also urged Armstrong to tell his story to an independent commission it has set up to examine claims that the sport's governing body hid suspicious samples, accepted financial donations, and helped Armstrong avoid detection in doping tests.

Sampling of Lance Armstrong's doping denials

-->

Justice delayed is justice denied

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

There has been much debate over the years and again in recent times about Jamaica severing ties with the London-based Privy Council and signing on to the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ).

Those advocating this position have argued that we have qualified and competent legal minds to handle our own affairs and that the time has come to join those who have already made this bold step and have our final appeals determined by this regional body.

But would this be as wise a move as it would be bold? I will leave that question to those more qualified in this field except to say that I would rather agree with Hugh Wildman on this matter than AJ Nicholson.

I have been following four matters before the criminal court relating to breaches of the Corruption Prevention Act and I must say I have some very serious concerns as to the way these matters are progressing.

They are the Cuban light bulb case, the Customs motor vehicle case, the NSWMA $161m case, and the bribery allegation against a noted businessman and a senior cop. With the exception of what is 'reported' in the media and excluding people like me who make some time to visit the RM Court to get first-hand knowledge, what exactly do we know about the status of these matters?

1. The Cuban light bulb case has been before the courts since 2007 and all we know is that the matter will resume on January 21, 2013. It's been four years! How can this be, madam DPP? Was the investigation complete prior to the arrest of Mr Spencer and his co-accused?

2. To date, we have heard nothing more of the investigation into the matter involving the sale of high-end vehicles to very well-known Jamaicans and no one seems to be asking any questions about the status of this matter. Why is this so? A young man was arrested, charged and his name and reputation totally destroyed in the media. Was that investigation complete, if not, why not, madam DPP?

3. Is it true that on January 15, 2013, the RM Court was told that the figure involving the NSWMA fraud case is now just over $12 million, down from the $161 million originally reported? What is the reason for this massive reduction and where is this case heading? Is this what we want to institutionalise with a CCJ? Justice delayed is justice denied and, by the way, what is the qualification of our investigators? We need answers.

4. Why have we heard nothing more of the bribery case involving that businessman except that a noted QC joined the legal team? Was his file ready prior to the arrest and charge, if not, why not? He wasn't hiding or going anywhere, so why rush to arrest and charge and confiscate travel documents before completing your work?

It seems to me that the Jamaican media are also failing in their duties and should be called on to explain their own lack of investigations in these matters. I watch CNN, Fox and MSNBC daily and it's amazing how much information is provided to the public on matters like these. Legal analysts are invited on shows and discussions take place with interpretation of the various laws. Why not in Jamaica?

Frankly, it is a little unfair for the media to spend so much time and resources championing the cause for 'freedom of the press' when they fail to carry out proper investigative journalism so that the public can be properly informed and so that there can be no question of bias or irresponsible journalism.

I call on the media in Jamaica to put a little more effort into investigating rather than simply reporting what was said by a minister or a police investigator or indeed, by the DPP. You owe it to the public and to those you are so quick to feature in your headlines when the story is negative and damaging.

As for the DPP and the courts, all I can say is justice delayed is justice denied.

Marcia Pitter-Brown

Kingston

Justice delayed is justice denied

-->

Why not an interfaith Leadership Prayer Breakfast?

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

If our motto is truly "Out Of Many, One People" and this is a plural society, our school curricula must reflect this and government action must exemplify this.

I was extremely disappointed to see the Christian programme at the National Leadership Prayer Breakfast yesterday. The dominant Christian majority and religion, which cut across creed and class in this country, must take into consideration the susceptibilities of the smaller religious denominations. There is no State religion here.

Jamaica is neither a "Christian" nor a "Black" country. An interfaith Leadership Prayer Breakfast would have been so much more appropriate. The salient point is that we cannot continue to be ignorant of ourselves and the society we are attempting to construct. We were brought here and/or have come from all parts of the globe, not to form a civilisation, but rather for the economic and social benefit of the metropole.

Has the trauma of the Middle Passage sufficiently subsided, or has it been adequately conquered to allow groups and the collective to be able to advance from the condition of being brought to a state of being comfortable enough to fashion something out of our existence?

With our Golden Jubilee behind us, and as we look forward to the next 50 years, let us not only acknowledge and take pride in our accomplishments, but let us take this opportunity to look ahead and envision the future where all our peoples find equal place.

Andrew King

Kingston

abking020@gmail.com

Why not an interfaith Leadership Prayer Breakfast?

-->

Will Caricom see two new one-term governments?

$
0
0
BRIDGETOWN, Barbados — With the announcement of a February 19 general election now made in Grenada, and Barbadians expected to go to the polls next month as well, speculation is rife that the Caribbean Community will see two one-term governments under two first-time prime ministers.

Unlike the electorate of Grenada, Barbadian voters have never restricted an incumbent party to one term in government. It would, therefore, be a historic political development should the current Democratic Labour Party (DLP) Administration of Prime Minister Freundel Stuart suffer such an inglorious political fate.

At present, Stuart maintains a stoic public posture of being unfazed over widening criticisms from political opponents and media commentators over his failure to announce the date for new general elections before January 15 -- the fifth anniversary of the DLP's return to state power in 2008 when it defeated the three-term Barbados Labour Party (BLP) Administration of then Prime Minister Owen Arthur.

Nor has he publicly betrayed any political nervousness of the electorate breaking with the tradition of giving governments a second chance, and even three terms.

Stuart, who like his Grenadian counterpart, is a lawyer by profession, became a first-time prime minister on October 23, 2010, with the death from cancer that same day of the DLP's leader and first-time Prime Minister David Thompson.

PM Stuart's challenge

He was successful in overcoming recurring media reports of divisions within his Cabinet and threats to his leadership, treating them with contempt. Even specific details of a circulated letter had pointed to the leading elements, among them Finance Minister Chris Sinckler, involved in critical assessment of his leadership style.

Stuart has even shown his contempt for two successive public opinion polls last year that pointed to the first-time possibility of a one-term DLP Government.

Now that the fifth anniversary of the 2008 general election has passed without an announcement, and with Grenadians preparing for February 19 as their voting day, it is felt that Stuart could well announce the election date next Monday -- January 21 -- which is observed as Errol Barrow Day, a national holiday in honour of the founder/leader of the DLP and 'Father of Independence". At the last election, the DLP scored a landslide 20-10 victory against the three-term BLP.

Grenadian scenario

Across in the Spice Isle of Grenada, the 'wind of change' in Government appears to be blowing even stronger against Prime Minister Tillman Thomas's National Democratic Congress (NDC) Administration.

On the basis of private polls, the Opposition New National Party (NNP) of former three-term Prime Minister Keith Mitchell is heading back to Government with a decisive majority for the 15-member House of Representatives. At the July 2008 election, the NNP had managed to win just four of the parliamentary seats.

The NNP is understandably exploiting the serious divisions Prime Minister Thomas has been facing, both within his NDC and Cabinet, that had compelled him to leave the Grenada Parliament prorogued for a few months.

For its part, the incumbent's strategies for a second-term victory include regurgitating some controversial cases of alleged financial corruption and political nepotism that had surfaced during the NNP's tenure in government.

One of the current issues hitting the election campaign is a civil court matter involving the NNP's leader and his wife and a former employee. Last November, a Brooklyn court judge issued an order for both Mitchell and his wife Marieta to appear before him this coming February 18.

That date, unboubtedly, must have influenced Prime Minister Thomas's announcement for the February 19 general election. His NDC seems bent on making it a hot campaign issue.

But Mitchell, not surprisingly, has been playing it cool. That civil case, he said with confidence, "is not a problem" either for him or his party, and forecasts the NNP's return to Government on February 19.

The last two one-term governments in Caricom were those of St Lucia's United Workers Party (UWP) and Jamaica's Jamaica Labour Party (JLP).

In St Lucia, Prime Minister Stephenson King was defeated at the November 2011 election by Kenny Anthony's St Lucia Labour Party, while in Jamaica, the Andrew Holness-led JLP lost the December 2011 polls to the People's National Party led by Portia Simpson Miller.

Will Caricom see two new one-term governments?

-->

Tired of living like a slave

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

I'm no bright spark but I know I'm a slave of the State.

I've been employed by the Government of Jamaica, within an organisation that falls under the Ministry of Education for almost three years now, and thus far I've got nothing to show of my years in the service.

I'm currently earning a monthly salary that's next to nothing — $26,595 after tax, from which more than half is used to fund transportation to and from work. I'm no bright spark but yet I'm no dunce as I've got five CXCs — English Language, Social Studies, Visual Arts, Biology, and Information Technology.

Some years ago, I worked in the private sector doing manual labour. Back then I was way more comfy working, as I could see what I was working for. I could save a little and I could afford to stay alive. In fact there is an individual I left at the plant who is now driving a car he bought not too long ago while I, a government employee, can't afford to feed myself for a month.

My uncle, who has been working at the same plant too for quite a few years and is now doing sanitation duties, takes home more than twice my pay at over $50,000.

At age 25 years and seven months I've got no money in the bank, no furniture bought and no major achievement accomplished and I'm still living with my mother. If it wasn't for Sagicor's health/life plan I know I would have probably died many times before, as I couldn't afford to pay for a doctor's visit.

I live a life on credit, forever owing someone, as I can't afford whatever I want or need straight up.

Being paid monthly makes matters even worse as I only know that on the 25th of the month it's 'pay day', but such days only bring pain as what you earn for the month is so meagre. It takes months for the working man I am to buy a pair of jeans and even longer for a pair of shoes. I've never voted and I will never vote for the current Government or the Opposition as neither of the two is worth my vote.

What kind of Government pays an employee such a meagre salary? How can someone survive on that, especially with the constant hike in the prices of life's essentials? I mean, what kind of prime minister do we have? Our prime minister deserves to be banned from politics, she knows nothing of what she does. It's more than a year now and still I've seen nothing that she has done, and if she has done anything, it's definitely not in my community.

I know for sure that the current Government and our MP, Mr DK Duncan, will never win again in my constituency. No member of my household and family will vote for either party again and by right, who would vote to be a slave for another umpteen years?

As I write this I'm currently a broken man, in the pockets and within. I've got way over a week before the slave I am gets "paid", and I've got no money to buy food or to take me to work till then. People see me on the road and think I've got money as they say "you deh wuk fi govament", but I pity their simple minds as I suffer far more than they do.

The Government of Jamaica is cruel.

The prime minister doesn't watch the news so she knows not of the sufferings of the nation. She doesn't hear the cry of the people.

The country is now a great big plantation and everyone is a slave in one way or another. Everyone but the prime minister. What I earn per month is merely a fraction of what the prime minister and even her MPs probably use to fund their parties. What I'm being paid monthly is probably just what they spend on gas for their high-end vehicles. What I'm being paid monthly is probably what they take to the supermarket monthly, if not weekly, yet we are supposed to survive and feed and support our families. We are left to feed and support our families and be present at work every day for a whole month on your "gas money"!!

This is madness. I see life getting more and more expensive every day. Food, which is a vital need, skyrocketed over the past few years, and since then there has been no slowing down or end to it. Gas, transportation costs, health, etc keep getting more expensive, yet the salaries of the slaves of the nation like myself remain dormant.

There are days when I get up and feel like not going to work as I've got no inspiration, no motivation at all because at the end of the month there is nothing to show for a month's work. Take last Christmas, for example. I had no "Christmas dinner" as I couldn't afford to buy food. My mom and I had nothing to eat. After paying all my debts I had nothing left to buy anything to cook for the most festive holiday of the year.

This was a first for me and my mother.

I had to go to a get-together where I was given a styrofoam plate of food with rice that wasn't even cooked properly while my mom at home ate a piece of "cake" given to her that had more flour in it than any other ingredients. We survived, though. We are grateful.

I'm sure the prime minister had so much to choose from. I'm sure she had more prepared than she wanted or could consume, and I'm mighty sure she wasn't thinking about the poor. I'm sure while she ate and laughed she had not a care in the world for anything else but the moment.

I'm not an advisor to the prime minister or any arm of the Government. I'm not telling her how to run the country, but what I'm trying to get across to the leaders is that we need more. People are suffering a whole lot in this country. Sure, some of us may be employed, but we all know that we deserve more. I know you know we deserve more. What is currently happening is cruel. Taxing so much of the pittance we earn. I just hope you read the newspapers. I just hope you get a chance to read this yourself.

If you truly have a heart, please prove me wrong. Please show you really love the poor. Please show us you are worthy to be trusted to lead this country on the right path. If not I plead that you just step aside and let someone with a heart, let someone who cares, someone who listens to the people [and the news], let someone who has suffered too and who knows what it's like to suffer lead this country.

I am tired of living life as a slave. I am tired of the suffering. I'm tired of all the blatant political lies. I am tired of this Government and the Opposition too. This country needs a leader, and thus far neither Andrew Holness nor Portia Simpson Miller has proven to be that person.

I've only been around for 25 years but I've lived long enough to have identified one such person, one for whom I have a great amount of respect. Unfortunately that person is no longer in active politics. That person is the Rt Hon Percival James Patterson.

Since his departure from Jamaica's political landscape, I've watched the country plummet deeper into shambles. I've watched the nation fall, and if it wasn't for sports and the likes of Asafa Powell, Usain Bolt, etc, the country wouldn't even be recognised or be associated with anything good or positive.

There is so much I would like to say to you, Mrs Simpson Miller. There is so much I would love for you to see and experience, but unfortunately at the present moment I can't, so I'm asking you to just look into yourself, the life of others and the well-being of this country and make the right choices.

Just think about it.

Slave in distress

Kerrmainc_ent@yahoo.com

Tired of living like a slave

-->

Thanks for saving our vacation, Sandals

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

This is an open letter to Sandals Chairman Gordon 'Butch' Stewart.

RE: Christmas Stay 2012 - Booking No 6823589

First, to everyone at Sandals, from your corporate offices to the housekeeping personnel at Montego Bay, thank you. I cannot express or convey the magnitude of those words to you, but all of you took a very horrible start to a romantic escape for my wife (Sue) and I and turned it into another unforgettable journey.

The planning for this trip was intense. I had booked the trip late September 2012. My plan: surprise my wife with a getaway to St Lucia over Christmas for a late anniversary, on-time Christmas, and early birthday gift.

We were scheduled for La Toc and I had made plans for traversing the Pitons and snorkelling. I called the school where she teaches, arranged without her knowledge a substitute, and my plans were enacted. I brought her sister in on the secret and the night before our departure we went to Columbus, Ohio where we were to leave on a plane bound for Miami at 6:20 am on December 20th.

Over dinner, she unwrapped silly Christmas gifts like a towel, suntan oil, and lastly, our passports. Her surprise was priceless. Let the romance begin! We retired early that evening. Weather predictions were for a little snow, but I had made arrangements at a hotel only 10 minutes from the airport. I was restless and wide awake at 4:00 am.

At 4:45 am, I woke Sue to go to the airport. They requested check-in to be conducted 60 minutes ahead of time. In the car by 5:10 am, we left. I always scout my route the night before, but this time I did not. I missed my turn. When back on track, we were parked and walking into the airport at 5:40 am, 20 minutes behind schedule.

The line for American Airlines was nearly out the door at the check-in counter. Sue held our place in line as I went to the kiosk to try to check in there. It didn't work because we were travelling international. We had to stand in line. At 6:10 am, we were at the ticket counter and the agent said, "I pulled all the Miami flyers out of line at 5:40 am so they could get to their flight on time. I doubt you will make it."

We were at the security gate by 6:15 am. There wasn't much of a line. We scrambled out of our shoes and unloaded our pockets, placing our carry-ons on the conveyor. My wife stepped through the scanner and then myself.

Security asked loudly, "Whose bag is this?" Urgh! It was my wife's. From the gifts the night before, the suntan oil had stopped us (6:17 am). The next thing we heard, "Whose bag is this?" It was mine! Toothpaste! So, after my wife cleared hers (6:18 am), I sprinted to the gate while she waited for my toothpaste to get confiscated.

I ran up to the gate, no attendant. I looked out the window and there, still connected to the walkway, was our aeroplane. I walked over to the door to go into the walkway, locked!

My wife showed up, out of breath. I told her there was no one here and the door was locked to get to the plane. She said, "But it is right there!" I told her the door was locked and no one will open up. We watched as our dream vacation pulled away from the gang-plank and taxied onto the runway.

Sue broke down into nearly hysterical crying. The lady at the boarding gate was sympathetic, but could do nothing. We were there at 6:20 am and for the first time in my life, the plane actually left on time! Our only real consolation at this point was that someone came up to catch the plane later than us. Misery really does love company.

My hopes weren't yet dashed. We were a little disheartened that we would get to St Lucia a little later, but not obliterated — that would come later. We made our way back to the ticket counter to speak with the airline about our options. I asked when the next flight to Miami would be available so that we could get on our way and catch the plane to the island.

The answer was that they were sorry, but there were no seats available to Miami until the following day (December 21). Then came the devastating news, while we could get to Miami, no plane would be leaving for St Lucia until Saturday, Dec 22, and there were only two seats available.

All of this occurred before 7:00 am. We stepped out of line to weigh our options. Sue went to Delta, Air Canada, United; no one had a flight. I tried to call Sandals so that I could let them know our status and that we wouldn't be there at the time I had stated on the online check-in. Your reservation lines do not open until 7:00 am, so I got a recording.

Finally, 7:00 am came. I got through to a reservation person and explained our situation. I asked if there was any way I could extend my stay to recoup the two days I would lose by showing up on the 22nd. He said I could, but then he gave a price for the two days. It was more than what I had paid for the entire vacation package!

I asked about transferring to another resort, he said I would have to pay for a new vacation! At this point, if we were able to go, we would forfeit nearly half our excursion time. I was devastated. It felt as if someone had sucked all the life right out of me. We are not people of vast means, but average. It takes some budgeting to have this kind of luxury.

I resigned to go back to the airline and take the shortened trip. I walked up to the counter and told the agent our intent. She said, "Sorry, there are no more seats available to St Lucia until December 25." Could this get any worse? My wife had made friends with the agent from Delta and she thought she had something for us, but that, too, fell flat.

It was approaching 8:30 am and I remembered that the Sandals reservation line and the Sandals Select Rewards phone numbers were different (888 vs 800). I called the 800 number hoping to speak to someone more corporate because that number said they opened at 8:30 am. A delightful voice with an island accent answered and said, "This is Lizzy."

I went through the above story with Lizzy. I said that with no flights available to St Lucia, is there anything I can do like go to another resort? To my amazement, she said, "Do you have one that you would like to go to already picked out?" She kind of caught me off guard because I asked, "You mean I can do that?" She said it shouldn't be a problem as long as there was availability and I, of course, could get a flight.

She said there would be a transfer fee, but where would I want to go. We had been to Montego Bay for our honeymoon/anniversary back in 2010, so without any hesitation, I told her we had been there, loved it, and would go there if at all possible. She had me hold while she contacted the resort to see about the time period.

To shorten the story, she returned on the line and said that there was time available from December 21 to December 25. I said, "We will take it." Her computers weren't working for some reason, but she said go ahead and make the flight arrangements and she would call me with all the booking information.

I went straight to the airline counter. I watched my wife take the call with Lizzy as they set up the booking. I told the airline what a wonderful thing Sandals was doing so that we could enjoy our getaway and that I needed a flight to Montego Bay the next day (December 21st) with return on the 25th. The lady at the airline was so heartbroken for us because of what had happened that she transferred all the tickets without any transfer fees or penalties.

While I was making the flight arrangements, Sue came up to me with Lizzy on the phone and said, "Lizzy is trying to see if she can salvage the day we were losing and have us come back on the 26th!" Because I was making the arrangements for a return on the 25th, I told her that we would deal with that once we were in Montego Bay.

Lizzy saved our romantic adventure. Not only that, but the room we received in Montego Bay was equivalent to the one we would have had in St Lucia. WOW!! We were overwhelmed by the room, location, and ultimate service. I did not expect the room to be as grand as it was. Our expectations were well exceeded.

I would also like to extend this thank you to a select few at Montego Bay who made this vacation even better. Pauline, our housekeeper, greeted us every day with pleasant conversation and excellent service. Cleveland made sure to speak with us at Tokyo Joe's and then was there again in the morning at Bayside.

The trip wouldn't have been good without the smiling face of Robert in the morning and then again in the Oleander Room. A new face we thought performed above and beyond was Junior. He was also at the Bayside. The lady at the gift shop did not only remember us from our visit two years ago, but even remembered what shirt I had bought.

I still hope to make it to St Lucia sometime soon. By your impeccable service and commitment to excellence, I believe we have convinced several of our family members and close friends to visit your resorts as well.

Again, I want to thank you for helping my wife and I make memories even through such adversity.

Randy Bentley

992 Herms Hill Road

Wheelersburg, Ohio 45694

randy.bentley@netzero.net

Thanks for saving our vacation, Sandals

-->

If leaders see the horror of war...

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Some time ago, I read where a British TV station was going to show, briefly, graphic footage of two British soldiers killed in Iraq. Such scenes are extremely unpleasant, but I daresay that if people would much more often see the human butchery we call war, in all its bloody gruesomeness, they would literally scream at their leaders to stop it.

Scenes of mutilated bodies don't sit well with any glamourised notion of war and so such photos are seldom published. During the Vietnam War, when one magazine ran a picture of a decapitated soldier, people got sick to the stomach.

I hate to say this, but maybe we should start showing shattered limbs, faces shot off, and other gory images. I "hear" you shout, "Stop already", but I've not even started on the psychological and emotional damage and then, too, these are only words, not photos or TV clips, and a far cry from the moans, the gore, the stench, and the utter agony of the battlefield itself.

Anyone who thinks that soldiers give their lives for their country is badly mistaken; those precious lives are brutally wrested from them. People who clamour and push for war, manufacturers and dealers of arms who help create war, politicians who are ever ready to send young people to war, religious people who loudly proclaim so-called Just and Holy War theories, or even those who simply accept war as inevitable, seldom see the horror of it. They need to see it at its worst.

Stan Penner

Box 53

Landmark, MB Canada

If leaders see the horror of war...

-->

Has the Public Sector Modernisation Programme vision died?

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

The Public Sector Modernisation Programme (PSMP) started in 1988 under the name of the Government Administrative Reform Programme, funded by the World Bank, and has gone through numerous phases since then. After reading the 2011/12 Auditor General's Report, I asked the simple question, has the PSMP vision died?

Why do I ask this question? I quote the following from the report (pages 107-108):

8.2.126 The audit of the accounting records and financial transactions of the ministry revealed systemic weaknesses in the controls governing the management of its resources. Consequently, we found unsatisfactory conditions such as: arrears in the reconciliation of bank accounts; payment and procurement breaches; delays in lodgements; inadequate control over fixed assets and advances. The ministry was urged to strengthen the internal controls to safeguard their assets and ensure strict compliance with the Government's guidelines.

Internal Control Weaknesses

8.2.127 Weaknesses were observed in the controls governing blank cheques and fixed assets. We found that 9,000 cheques were not included on the cheque register, and fixed assets totalling $853,474 were not recorded on the ministry's inventory records. Further, 58 items of electronic equipment were not presented for audit inspection, despite requests. We recommended that the ministry comply with the relevant government guidelines and present the equipment for inspection. Management has since taken corrective action to strengthen the control weaknesses identified.

Procurement Breaches

8.2.128 A contract to install an electronic security system at a value of $6 million did not include a completion date and a defects liability clause. We recommended that the ministry ensure compliance with Government procurement guidelines and related regulations.

8.2.129 The ministry failed to report to the Office of the Contractor General (OCG) the award of 10 contracts totalling $29.7 million, in breach of the Contractor General Act. Two contracts with variations exceeding 50 per cent of the original contract sum were not reported to the National Contracts Commission. The Ministry indicated that the relevant reports were subsequently submitted to the OCG.

8.2.130 Contrary to the Ministry of Finance's payment procedures, the ministry made payments totalling $653,944 from its Deposit and Capital B accounts to meet its recurrent expenses. The ministry has since advised that these types of payments will not recur.

Compliance Audits

8.2.131 We found no evidence to indicate that the ministry was actively pursuing the clearing of outstanding balances for 1,250 accounts totalling $114.7 million as at December 2011. Included in the amount were credit balances totalling $3.3 million. Management's failure to monitor the advance accounts may result in the understatement of expenditure. Management was advised to institute an appropriate system to ensure the timely clearing of advances and regularise the credit balances. The ministry has indicated that more than 70 per cent of the advances have been cleared and that efforts are being made to ensure full clearance by March 31, 2013.

All the above should not be happening, based on what the Public Sector Modernisation Programme has gone through. Further, in terms of good governance, the cabinet secretary needs to revamp the role of permanent secretary as it would appear the people occupying those posts are not fulfilling their roles.

Ambassador Douglas Saunders needs to give an update.

Dr Charles Demontaque

Stafford University

101 Weybrige Road

Addlestone Road, Surrey

United Kingdom

charlesdemontaque@yahoo.co.uk

Has the Public Sector Modernisation Programme vision died?

-->

Issues for Jamaica

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Here lies the dilemma for Jamaican policymakers and the public at large. There is a disconnect between "what the people want" and "what the people need".

Key examples are:

* We the people need water services, but should the service provision response be communal or individual? Piped or tanked? Chlorinated or pure?

* We the people need lavatory facilities, but should the service provision response be communal or individual? Pit or flushed?

* We the people need housing, but should the service provision response be basic, low-cost or affordable? 100 square metres or 1,000 square metres?

* We the people need an education, but should the service provision response be to year six, year 11 or to level eight on the national qualification framework? Should it be free, subsidised or privatised?

* We the people need roads, but should the service provision response be defined roadway (gravelled) or active response roadway (all types as the need dictates)? Should it be free or tolled?

There are, I am sure, thousands of other issues that could be raised. Society has an obligation to itself and future generations, and so all decisions should be devoid of selfishness and greed. All choices must have a positive effect way beyond our lifetimes.

So any dialogue must be futuristic in outlook as the current populace may have to suffer for the future generations to reap these benefits. I think this is referred to as independence. The most ironic thing is, these questions apply to all countries.

As a Namibian of Jamaican parents I am asking Jamaicans the same questions I am asking Namibians whose independence is younger. It is apparent the problems are universal and so a reflection of us as a people is required to move forward.

These views are personal and expressed for the public as a whole to reflect on our lives. They are not intended for political or sectorial bashing.

David A Jarrett

RDJ Consulting Services CC

Windhoek

Namibia

Issues for Jamaica

-->

Unjust swipe against the CCJ

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

I write to respond to a letter by Marcia Pitter-Brown titled 'Justice delayed is justice denied' published in your newspaper of January 18, 2013.

That letter dealt with a number of issues and I am in full agreement with the truth conveyed in the headline, but I feel obliged, as a matter of fairness and information, to refute her argument that because a number of cases of high visibility in Jamaica have been in the court system for an unreasonably long time, that is a good reason for not wanting Jamaica to join the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ). If ever I saw an unjust swipe against an institution, that is it.

I write against the background of being a lawyer, Jamaican-born and bred, who has been practising in Barbados for many years and who has appeared before that court on two occasions.

Barbados is one of the countries that has the CCJ as its court of last resort and there is absolutely nothing in the history of how that court has dealt with matters on appeal that could possibly justify the smear in Ms Pitter-Brown's letter when, after alleging some unhappy facts relating to some NSWMA fraud case in Jamaica and asking where that case is heading, she leaps to asking, "Is this what we want to institutionalise with a CCJ?"

If Ms Pitter-Brown was to take a little time from watching CNN, Fox and MSNBC as she says she does daily, she may wish to go onto the website of the Caribbean Court of Justice and there read a number of cases in which the CCJ has been forthright and unrelenting in berating the courts of Barbados in respect of cases that have taken a long time to be heard and where, when cases have been heard, judgements have taken an unreasonably long time to be delivered.

I invite her and your other readers to access the case of Yolande Reid v Jerome Reid, the case of Ram Mirchandani and the case of Sea Haven Inc v Dyrud where, in that last case, the Court strongly criticised the fact that a case which commenced on June 6, 2002 was not heard until February 7, 2007.

It also criticised a period of four years and eight months taken in Sea Haven as being "a most unsatisfactory situation that needs to be remedied".

In Reid v Reid, a case in which I appeared, the CCJ in its judgement stated that the time taken to deliver judgement by the Court of Appeal was "an astonishing period of almost five years". The CCJ stated that such delays "deny parties the access to justice to which they are entitled and undermine public confidence in the administration of justice. The effectiveness of a judiciary is seriously compromised if it fails to monitor itself in respect of the time taken to deliver judgements and to arrest promptly any tendency to lapse in this aspect of its performance".

The CCJ has been on a mission to get the courts under its jurisdiction to deliver justice speedily, and apart from being unrelenting in its criticism of delay, it has actively taken steps to try to lift the standard of lawyering in the countries which have signed on to its appellate jurisdiction.

I can recall that Justice Adrian Saunders has conducted seminars on topics including one on costs to allow lawyers to familiarise themselves with necessary procedures.

I am truly concerned about the fact that my beloved Jamaica never seems to miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. It is a fact that apart from criminal cases where the state pays for the approach to the Privy Council, most ordinary Jamaicans cannot dream of taking a civil case to the Privy Council, because of the sheer expense of it.

I can attest to the fact that persons in the states which have joined the CCJ have much greater access to that court as financially, such a case is much more within their financial capability.

It should also be of interest to my fellow Jamaicans that the CCJ has been reaching out to persons of limited means under a facility provided under Rule 10.6 of the Caribbean Court of Justice where impoverished parties may apply to the court for special leave to appeal as a poor person.

In a recent speech made to the Bar Association in Barbados, the president of the CCJ revealed that 25 such applications had been filed and so the civil litigants at the level of the CCJ have not been limited to corporate or wealthy persons.

The statistics show the difference in access to justice that has been the experience in Barbados. In the five years prior to Barbados abolishing appeals to the Privy Council, there were only eight appeals to that body. In the seven years since Barbados joined the appellate jurisdiction of the CCJ, there have been 25 appeals to the CCJ from Barbados as at December 2012, showing a greater access to justice than previously obtained.

I am saddened that the deep-seated distrust of ourselves has resulted in false stories being bandied about the CCJ. Of what use is the present right of Jamaicans to take a civil appeal to the Privy Council if most Jamaicans could not possibly afford to go there? I am also at a loss to understand what it is that Jamaicans are afraid will happen to them by joining the CCJ's appeal jurisdiction.

The experience in Barbados has been that the CCJ has opened up the possibilities of access to justice for Barbadians and we have no reason to feel that we have been short-changed in any way. We have been able to stay in Barbados for many of the preliminary stages of the Appeal as the CCJ is not averse to using technology to avoid unnecessary airline trips to Trinidad.

We have all seen that court come to Barbados to sit in the Myrie case and it has made it known as a policy that it is amenable to visiting other jurisdictions if proper arrangements can be made.,

It is time we have respect for ourselves and realise that not because the judges are mainly Caribbean people, we should consider them to be sub-standard. Their stance against delay is well documented, and their strong, disapproving comments against fellow judges in the islands, when warranted, do not suggest that the Court operates on the good old boy principle.

I would implore Jamaicans not to be misled by persons who have no personal experience whatever of the CCJ, but who seem not to be able to withhold foisting their prejudices against that body on the general populace.

Beverley J Walrond, QC

bev.law@me.com

Unjust swipe against the CCJ

-->

Protecting teachers from student abuse

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

One of the woes of our teachers over the years has been managing student behaviour in classrooms.

Courses such as 'Understanding the Learner' and 'Principles of Teaching and Learning' have done little to prepare our teachers to deal with delinquent students in the classroom. Teachers try to understand their students and to use the rules implemented by the school to curb unruly behaviour. However, there is no official document which protects our teachers from abuse by students in our overcrowded classrooms.

We need a standardised system to protect our teachers from harm and abuse by students and this must not be left up to the individual schools to decide. Minister Ronald Thwaites, I implore you to develop a standardised contract for students islandwide outlining the expected behaviour at school and in the classroom.

Breach of this contract should attract certain penalties which will deter students from committing an offence.

If this initiative is successful, the teacher can focus more on the academic and social needs of the students, which should be at the forefront of the education process, and not on a tug-of-war with students who do not respect authority, which may be due to a lack of proper parenting.

As teachers, our desire is to help secure our nation's future by offering quality education to our students. We will work together to achieve the 100 per cent literacy and 85 per cent numeracy set out for 2013. It is my belief that 'Every Child Can Learn'. They must.

Rookie teacher

abuckle@yahoo.com

Protecting teachers from student abuse

-->

When people lie without shame

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

We all listened in amazement as Oprah Winfrey took Lance Armstrong through the process of revealing himself to the world on January 17, 2013.

As we sat riveted, many of us asked "Can people lie so much?", "Can people be so barefaced?"

The answer, sadly, is "Yes". Sometimes these people, unfortunately, aren't the distant Lance Armstrong, but a boss, board chairman, neighbour, colleague, or even a person whose friendship is based on persistent deception.

Whomever it is, it impacts our psyche in some way, and it hurts. This hurt may be borne out in frustrated silence or open rebellion.

For years Lance Armstrong took performance-enhancing drugs and denied all accusations that he had. He lambasted those who claimed to have knowledge of it and dragged them through hell. He claimed that he was only guilty of having a special gift which he enhanced through hard work.

Folks admired his confidence, his 'gift' and his resilience in having bounced back from cancer, as well as his enormous benevolence. But Lance Armstrong was not who he projected; there was self-deception, and there was deception of the world communicated through lies.

Somewhere in the core of people like Lance Armstrong is a type of sociopath, I believe — no conscience, cold, narcissistic, and a win-at-all-cost mentality.

Should we forgive them, should we just learn to work with them, or should we avoid them once we begin to suspect their 'illness'?

Lance Armstrong admitted that his years of lying were tantamount to bullyism, as he vehemently denied charges made by colleagues and others with intimate knowledge of his love and use of performance-enhancing drugs.

I can truly empathise with his cycling colleagues. They were deprived of opportunities, big bucks, and recognition because of this 'sick' person, but as intimated earlier, he is certainly not the only 'sick' individual amongst us.

The 'sick' are amoung us, thriving off their lies. When threatened in any way, they exercise their 'right' to lie-to-the-max to maintain control. They are without shame. Continuous and complete control is their objective.

Arrogance and an irritating sense of entitlement are other dimensions of their personality. This resulted in Armstrong having to answer 'No' to questions like:

Did it feel wrong at the time?

Did it feel like cheating?

Because taking the drugs was not seen as cheating, to him he had done nothing wrong; so in the cocoon which was his world, he was not lying. It was, I guess, the fools on the outside in the small world which existed parallel to his, who were making these wild and baseless accusations of cheating.

Deception is as old as the hills, almost. Just remember the story of Jacob and Esau. Persistent lying, though, tells a lot about a person, not least of all the fact that this is someone to be feared.

Have you ever had someone look straight at you and not just tell a big lie, but tell a big lie on you? Have you ever dealt with someone who used one grain of truth as a basis to create a web of lies? That is the stuff that these liars are made of, and they are unflinching in their carriage.

These people's deception and lies are their reality. They seem not to know the difference between reality and fantasy. Not to be left out are their enablers — people who, for the most part, depend on them for something, such as salaries, recognition, a bribe, friendship, etc.

Persistent liars need professional intervention, to include cognitive restructuring. Maybe this will help if and when they realise that they need help.

Patricia E Johnson

Victory99967@yahoo.com

When people lie without shame

-->

Options besides IMF should be revealed

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Prime Minister Simpson Miller chuckled when asked by a journalist what ‘Plan B’ was, as it relates to our negotiations with the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

‘Plan B’ was probably not revealed by the prime minister for strategic economic and political reasons.

It is of utmost importance for our leaders to have at least another option when faced with matters of such a critical nature and remain open-minded.

Jamaica’s current economic situation may not yet be at the stage where it becomes universally accepted that we are in a crisis, but the longer we take to finalise an agreement with the IMF, the more this is likely.

How will the protracted delay affect or alter ‘Plan B’ or any other options that the Government may be contemplating?

The global economic situation is unfavourable and unpredictable. Options allow us to create opportunities from adversity. People get anxious or panic when they start running out of options, and an accepted definition of hell is enduring the unbearable without any option.

It is for these reasons that it may not prove a bad idea for the Government to reconsider and allow for more openness, so there can be timely evaluation of the limited options available, and prompt action based on the path more suitable to Jamaica’s economic and political interests.

Hesitation and inaction will certainly worsen our economic situation.

Daive R Facey

DR.Facey@gmail.com


Reject new taxes unless...

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

I wish to endorse a proposal by a morning talk-show host that until the Government can prove that they are not wasting taxes we should not agree to any additional taxation proposed in the next budget.

In fact, I support his idea that we should seriously look at the possibility of action under the Charter of Rights for recovery of the tax misspent or wantonly squandered, as shown in the recent report of the auditor general.

I'm prepared to make a contribution to the cost of such action. We need the Government to report to the nation on what steps they plan to take to fix the problems identified by the auditor general before new tax measures are announced.

This should be done in the same format as the auditor general's report, should explain what happened, why it happened, and say what steps will/have been taken to prevent a recurrence.

This is a normal requirement of every business that is audited, and CEOs can lose their jobs if the same thing happens the following year.

This brings me to my next bellyache, which is that there seems to me to be little or no co-ordination between the ministries and, for that matter, in the overall business of running our country.

This brings to mind the saying that "companies/governments don't plan to fail, they simply fail to plan".

Till we get this right, we will not be able to have a prosperous country where our governments and those who work in the civil service and other government organisations are held accountable for their stewardship.

Peter Thwaites

pjsr40@gmail.com

Reject new taxes unless...

-->

Who has the moral authority to penalise Mr Witter?

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Jamaica is indeed a land of promises mainly not kept. Yet we are focusing on Public Defender Earl Witter and his inability to produce a report that the Government should easily be able to assist him with.

The sticking point is the ballistic report which should reveal to us who killed whom.

The United States is an ally and has footage from the P3C Orion plane that assisted the security forces during the Tivoli operation. What would it take for our charming prime minister to request such a tape on behalf of our people, since this is such a critical matter? Or do we already have such footage?

We shouldn’t need a foreign journalist or Yale law students to take the US to court to demand such footage. Is it too embarrassing for us to have, since we have the Finsac report also due? We cannot bury both reports; the stink would be unbearable.

Mr Witter is simply following in the footsteps of our leaders who deem that “promise is a comfort to a fool”.

Remember Audley Shaw promising the Nurses Association of Jamaica an increase of twice their pay if the JLP came to office? Bruce Golding promised to put his political career on the line over the Christopher ‘Dudus’ Coke extradition request; instead he fired poor Dorothy Lightbourne.

Phillip Paulwell promised the nation 140,000 information technology jobs; the current prime minister promised to complete the IMF agreement in two weeks and to review the Buggery Act, which saw thousands of gays, lesbians and transexuals running to vote for the present party. With such support they couldn’t lose.

Who has the moral authority to penalise Mr Witter for incompetence and unfulfilled promises? Which Public defender Earl Witter one of us will cast the first stone? Senator Malahoo-Forte said recently that we set up public institutions to undermine them. If Mr Witter is an embarrassment to his office, then so is the entire Cabinet, with few exceptions. Are we going to ask them to resign?

Mark Clarke

Siloah, St Elizabeth

mark_clarke9@yahoo.com

The basic moves of teaching

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

The classroom strategies used by teachers decades ago have become almost irrelevant. More and more we are hearing teachers saying that students today are harder to teach.

The truth is that students now have different perceptions and expectations of learning. As a result, many teachers now need to employ what is called 'the basic moves of teaching'.

According to Green & Henriquez-Green, 2005, the basic moves of teaching are (a) having the classroom in a healthy, productive learning environment; (b) having the knowledge and the skill to set up an environment which includes being asked meaningful questions; and (c) knowing how to use assessment to ensure that learning has taken place.

The learning environment must ensure that all students are able to experience learning. Confidence must be displayed by the teacher in setting the tone for the class by using appropriate strategies, structures and techniques in engaging the minds of the students.

It is important that teachers "move" to have students experience peace of mind, which will facilitate mental stimulation and thus promote learning. Both students and their teachers must establish rules that govern their class. I do endorse the system of reward and punishment, as mutual respect and order must be maintained to support the new environment.

The question I have for teachers is: Are you prepared to answer your students' questions?

Many teachers believe that not knowing the answers is a sign of weakness. But can a man know everything? Teachers must be prepared to provide answers, but if they genuinely don't know, they must tell students that they will "check out the facts", and get back to them.

Lyssette Hawthorne-Wilson

lysdave@yahoo.com

The basic moves of teaching

-->

Greater effort needed to promote Jamaica

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

I was looking at a link showing the top 10 cheapest destinations in the world for holidays and the top 10 most expensive. To my astonishment, Jamaica was in the top 10 of the most expensive.

I spent 18 months between 2002 and 2010 working as a British cop in Jamaica and fell in love with both Jamaica and its people.

Yet, despite my best efforts, I have failed to persuade any of my friends in London to holiday in Jamaica due to its negative image. When I point out that the satisfaction rate from those returning from vacations in Jamaica whom I met whilst working at both UK and Jamaican airports was around 99 per cent, it gets me nowhere.

The tragic death of Imani Green, which was a major story in the UK, and now these misleading figures as to vacation costs, only contribute to this negative image.

I have to ask exactly what the Jamaica Tourist Board is doing to promote Jamaica’s true image. A great opportunity was missed after Prince Harry’s visit and the efforts of Usain Bolt and the other Jamaican athletes at the London Olympics.

I am just completing a book which tells of my experiences in Jamaica. It is light-hearted and whilst it doesn’t ignore the problems faced by Jamaica, I believe it promotes a justifiably positive image of your country which, hopefully, will encourage tourism from the UK.

Let’s see a greater effort from both the Jamaican Government and tourist board to get those British tourists on the planes and into the hotels, not just on the north coast but Kingston as well.

Chris Hobbs

Hanwell, London

obbsie@virginmedia.com

Somebody has to pay

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

The no-user-fee policy that now exists in hospitals is being reviewed by the present Government as it is not sustainable. Somebody has to pay. Those who can afford to pay, should pay.

The Opposition, which instituted the policy while it was in Government, is crying foul. How do they expect the bills such as salaries of staff to be paid? Also, how do they expect light/water to be paid? Equipment to be bought or repaired without funding?

One of the former prime ministers said "it takes cash to care". Jamaica, like the rest of the world, cannot afford to do things the same way as before, based on what is happening globally. Even in the US they are looking at health care and its associated costs.

Claudette Harris

claudetteharris43@yahoo.com

Somebody has to pay

-->
Viewing all 9214 articles
Browse latest View live