Quantcast
Channel: Jamaica Observer
Viewing all 9214 articles
Browse latest View live

More money and a useless size

$
0
0
Friends, tell ministers to tek fancy talk out a di budget debate and tell us how much more money (25) we have to find to pay taxes and user fees. So minister (34), talking fi so long to tell us this and that no turn on anybody. We can’t escape the higher fees, so just talk to us about that.

Dem seh pickney (11,16) learn from parents but it looks like dogs really learn from their masters. If dem see people in the road and won’t move when a vehicle is approaching, don’t expect di dog (11) and puss (14) fi do any better. Mi see that yesterday when mi travel through the inner-city area.

If the rain (24) in March is anything to go by, April will be wet and cool. Not a bad idea at all. But we never know what the future holds.

Man oh man. Poor fellow. The British press carried the story of a man who has outdone himself — all of 18-plus inches long. But the downside is that the size of charlie (6) has left him lonely as no one from the fairer sex wants to get near him. Poor fellow.

Anyway, until such time, be good.

Raise alcohol drinking age limit to 21

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

With the current debate of banning the music or at least banning production of music of convicted criminals serving time it would be prudent for our parliamentarians to consider raising the age limit for alcohol purchase and consumption from 18 to 21.

The inability to enforce the law prohibiting under-age alcohol consumption at dances and parties is glaring evidence that the age limit should be raised. Other countries such as Côte d’Ivoire, Equatorial Guinea, Iraq, Mongolia, Sri Lanka, and parts of the United States have a minimum legal drinking age of 21.

It is already clear that alcohol impairs judgement, even in adults over 30. Unpopular as it may be with alcohol beverage companies and the youths themselves, the broader picture must be taken into account. With all the ills of society today, raising Jamaica’s minimum legal drinking age will assist with curbing these ills.

I call on the member of parliament for St Ann South Eastern Lisa Hanna and the member of parliament for St Elizabeth South Western Floyd Green, both charged with the political responsibility for youth, to make a bipartisan plea to raise the minimum age limit for alcohol purchase and consumption in Jamaica to 21.

Duncan “Junior” Buchanan

juniorbuck1@yahoo.com

Children are products of their environment

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Five of us, retired professionals over 70 years old, agreed to have Freddie’s two great grandsons, ages five and seven, spend a day with us.

Their mother would not give them up to Freddie who had filed for them and her son’s wife did not want to hear about them. They read for us, sang for us and showed us the latest dance steps and we laughed and tried them. They were bright kids. After lunch, they went out to play with the neighbours’ children and they soon came back with a ball they did not own.

“The lady in dat house say we have dirty mout and mussen play wid decent children. Wat we do, Grandy?”

The children played as they did in the settlement. They shouted to pass the r..s ball and other four-letter words that came out easily. They live in a neighbourhood where children are put in line with ‘beat, flog, kick and lick’. Parts of the body are identified in easy four-letter words like cock and boob. Four-letter words also identify the functions of the body and the children use the s..t and p..s, not because they have foul mouths but that they have not yet learnt the social acceptance of faeces and urine. Sometimes they use five-letter words for vagina and rectum but overall it’s the all-invasive, harsh-sounding four-letter words that’s making life miserable for them.

One of our other great-grand, recently moved uptown, was kicked out of a prep school because he was disruptive and loud. He dared to correct a teacher in a crude fashion. She kept talking about sexual intercourse, and this got on his nerves. He put up his hand and said: “Is lie shi ah tell oonu. It name f... Parents felt his presence in the school was not good for their children.

These children are products of their surroundings and ways have to be found to continue to save them as they and their parents become part of social mobility. A couple years ago, I was on an 8:00 am flight from New York to Kingston. The baby across the aisle began to bawl in a loud, rusty voice.

“Ah want mi bokkle. Ah want mi bc bokkle. Ah want mi rc bokkle.” The parents smiled as they silenced the fat baby who sucked the milk from a filled bottle. Some passengers got up to glare at the baby. We’d never heard this on a plane before. Again, the children are products of their environment and we have to find different ways of helping children who spew unacceptable four-letter words, to prepare for a better world.

Veronica Blake Carnegie.

veronica_carnegie @cwjamaica.com

Is Parliament tracking Vision 2030 progress?

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

One responsibility a member of parliament (MP) has is to inform and educate his/her constituents of any central government policies that affect them and to receive feedback to guide his/her own actions in carrying out legislative duty in Parliament.

I won’t regret making the statement that most MPs across the political divide have failed in their responsibility to develop civic-minded constituents. Critical to governance is citizen participation and buy-in.

A clear example of this comes in the form of another report updating the public on Jamaica’s National Development Plan (Vision 2030) that went under the radar with little, if any attention, given to the nine-page document published January 2017. The Vision 2030 Implementation falls under the ultimate responsibility of Cabinet, which has reporting responsibility to Parliament. Like so many reporting and accountability mechanisms in this country, this too has broken down.

The document that can be viewed on the Vision 2030 website states in bold highlight: “The progress reports represent the only space nationally that allows for the reporting on the overall development progress of Jamaica — that is social, economic, environmental and governance spheres of development.” Note the word “only”. Any policy document this crucial to national development and which will affect policy decisions should be presented to the representative of the people for a debate on the four goals and 15 national outcomes.

The Planning Institute of Jamaica (PIOJ), media and United Nations have their share of culpability. As the technical secretariat, the PIOJ, often holds press briefings to publicise its many reports on Jamaica, why has Vision 2030 not progressed? Where are the local media reports communicating this to the regular man?

With the new UN Multinational Sustainable Development Framework (MSDF), the UN should compel the Government of Jamaica to give the goals the vitality they deserve and need. Globally there has been great effort made to implement them through youth-led initiatives and innovation. Jamaica can benefit from galvanised youth energy around the goals.

The report states: “The area of greatest concern for the country is Goal Two: The Jamaican society is secure, cohesive and just, with no indicator related to security, justice or governance meeting or exceeding the 2015 target.”

It’s no coincidence that Goal Two indicators include Government Effectiveness Index, Regulatory Quality Index, Voice and Accountability Index.

With the Economic Growth Council taking centre stage as a creation of the Office of the Prime Minister, I suggest that the Vision 2030 secretariat report directly to a committee of Parliament.

Mario Boothe

m.raphael.b@gmail.com

Allow deportees their dignity

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

In my studies as a social worker one of the main lessons taught by my lecturer, and which stayed with me, is that we should always allow people their dignity, especially those who have fallen on hard times.

It is quite disturbing to see reporters pushing their microphones into the faces of different deportees without any consideration as to what they are going through. It cannot be that because of a scoop or a story we have forgotten to be humans and to think about others. The effect on most or some deportees psychologically, especially those without relatives to turn to, cannot be overstated, as now they have to be thinking: What am I going to do? Where can I lay my head tonight? Are there any homeless shelters that I can go to until I get my life in order?

There is just so much going on internally for them, and having cameras to highlight their plight, I believe, is too much. The media and reporters need to be more caring and considerate towards the current state, pain and fears of these deportees. Many of them do not even know where the next meal is coming from.

We could argue that they should have made something of themselves or they should have sent something back home to “fall back on”, unfortunately that did not happen for them. We all make mistakes. It cannot be that their noses have to be rubbed in it and they are put on public display for their misfortune.

I believe that a story, series or documentary could be done from a more sensitive perspective with the media houses asking those deportees who are willing to come forward and share their stories. They could go even further to help by building a halfway house so their transitioning and integration will be less difficult as they seek to get on their feet.

I also believe that if the half-way house is not a feasible idea, then the media have the clout to come up with other plans by involving the different stakeholders. The Government could also take the money the British Government is offering to have some infrastructure in place for those who are being deported.

Diana Somerville

Molynes Road

dianasommerville@yahoo.com

Health insurance tax counterproductive

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

For more than a year, at every turn, we’ve heard our Government voice the words “growth” and “prosperity”. But is that just talk?

Why would the same Government do something which is calculated to negatively impact growth and prosperity, its number one stated goal.

Health is fundamental to production/productivity, which themselves are fundamental to growth and prosperity.

Taxing health insurance premiums in a poor society will adversely affect health outcomes, pushing the prosperity goal further away.

Does our Government not understand the link between health and education and the role of education in building prosperity? Does Government understand the inextricable bond between health and happiness — the ultimate human desire?

It is a no-brainer that messing with health is counterproductive. It is far better to take a little more money from the National Housing Trust than to tax health insurance premiums, which will adversely affect the health of a significant sector of our population.

Patrick D Robinson

Main Street, Stony Hill

St Andrew

pdougrobins@gmail.com

Mr Burke, you owe Mr Higgins an apology

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Jamaica Observer columnist Michael Burke in his column, ‘20 years after the death of Michael Manley’, published on Thursday, March 9, 2017 stated inter alia: “Twenty years after the death of Michael Manley, Dr Peter Phillips is to become PNP president and opposition leader. A newspaper columnist who had taken a rest for about 10 months recently wrote a negative article about Phillips. Missing from that article is that when Dr Peter Phillips was minister of transport he established the Jamaica Urban Transit Company.”

I am assuming that Mr Burke was referring to the erudite, widely read, and highly respected Sunday Observer columnist Garfield Higgins’ article, ‘The many faces of Peter Phillips’, appearing on Sunday, March 5, 2017. Granted that I am correct then I must hasten to say that Mr Burke misrepresented the truth, and for that he owes Mr Higgins an apology.

I strongly suggest that Mr Burke go back and read that article once more. Contrary to what he would have readers believe, Mr Higgins did make mention of the establishment of the Jamaica Urban Transit Company (JUTC) under Dr Phillips’ watch, using a full paragraph in doing so. Mr Higgins, in according credit to Dr Phillips for the establishment of the JUTC stated, “Phillips was transport and works minister from 1998 to October 2001. To his eternal credit he ushered in a decent transportation system in the Kingston Metropolitan Transport Region (KMTR) in 1998. The groundwork for what is today the Jamaica Urban Transit Company (JUTC) Limited was started in 1995 when the then Government decided that the time had come to restructure the public transport sector and invest in infrastructure to bring order to public transportation in the KMTR. Before the advent of the JUTC what existed in the KMTR for public transportation was a disaster.”

I must further hasten to say that Mr Burke’s claim that Mr Higgins failed to indicate that when Dr Phillips was minister of transport he established the JUTC cannot be taken lightly, because it was an act of mendacity coming from one who, as a writer, is held to a high standard, and such act is not an asset to his credibility.

 

George Lawson

Bronx, New York

Mrgeelaws@yahoo

Many problems facing West Indies cricket

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

The West Indies cricket team has continued on the path of being consistently inconsistent by losing the recent One-Day International (ODI) series 3-0 to England, a team that is considered ordinary by many pundits.

The capitulation in the final game at the Kensington Oval in Barbados sums up the gloomy state of affairs that has hovered over our cricket for the past two decades. After putting up creditable displays in the first two games of the series, the team meekly surrendered and were walloped by 186 runs, their heaviest defeat to England in 50-over cricket.

Once again, Caribbean cricket fans are left to conduct a post-mortem on what has become the norm. Having been an ardent supporter of West Indies cricket for all my life and having watched the steady and painful decline of the team over the years, it is a no-brainer to diagnose the main reasons for which we have become the whipping boys of international cricket.

There are many problems facing West Indies Cricket, but I will focus on a few of the major ones. Firstly, there is too much politics entrenched in the administration of cricket in the region, which transfers to the selection of the team. This has severely hindered the make-up and quality of the team over the years as there have been several blatant selection errors, where players are included at the expense of others because of the island that they are from.

This is evident in the squad that was selected for the just concluded series. The team was predominantly made up of Bajan players. I do not have an issue with where the players are from, as long as they are selected on merit. Furthermore, Barbados are currently the champions of our Super50 tournament. Yet, there are question marks about the selection of at least two of their players in the current set-up, namely: Carlos Brathwaite and Shai Hope. Since his heroics in the World T20 final in 2016, Brathwaite has failed miserably in almost all tournaments and formats of cricket.

His mediocre returns would have had him struggling to be even selected in training squads for any other major international cricket team. He averages 13.50 with the bat from 23 ODIs and 47.47 with the ball, having been given the title “all-rounder”. In a recent interview, it was reported in the press that Courtney Browne, a member of the West Indies selection panel and Brathwaite’s fellow countryman, came to his defence by arguing that the West Indies should “invest” in the young man.

Interestingly, Windward Islands wicketkeeper batsman Sunil Ambris, who has been a consistent performer over the past two seasons in both the 50-over and four-day formats, was once again overlooked for the recent series against England. I believe Ambris’s aggressive style would have served the team better in the limited-overs format, although Hope also had a descent regional Super50 tournament. After all is said and done, both Braithwaite and Hope failed in the series against England.

Another point worth mentioning is the fact that having gone 0-2 in the series, I thought the selectors would have opted to play the talented and exciting Rovman Powell ahead of Brathwaite. In the just concluded Super50, Powell was the most impressive all-rounder in the tournament, but despite being selected in the squad, he was unable to make the final 11.

Another major issue for the current state of affairs in West Indies Cricket is the backward policy of deeming players ineligible for selection if they do not participate in full in our regional tournaments. This has prevented us from fielding our strongest team, especially in Test and ODIs. It is very difficult to fathom the reasoning behind this policy when the players are plying their trade in higher-quality leagues, while earning more money than we can afford to pay in the Caribbean.

Until we are able to fix this policy, we will remain in the doldrums.

Finally, the quality of the pitches in the Caribbean needs improvement as they do not allow for a balanced game of cricket, which is critical in developing the standard of the game. Curators need to be trained in the art of creating pitches that can provide assistance to both batsmen and bowlers. Presently, the condition of most cricket pitches in the Caribbean are not conducive to allowing players to effectively hone their craft and make a telling impact on the international stage.

I hope that I will see the West Indies back at the pinnacle of world cricket in the future. However, based on all that is happening, this might never come to fruition in my lifetime.

Jerdaine Sterling

jerdaine@hotmail.com


West Indies cricket embarrassing

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

I am not at all surprised at the results from our West Indies cricketers, particularly under the current leadership.

It is time that we either leave international cricket alone and spare ourselves continued embarrassment, or we get smart, sport-loving and knowledgeable business-oriented people to lead from the front and move our game forward.

For far too long we have continued to disrupt the players’ focus by being overly narrow-minded.

Which other cricketing nation deals with its players as the WICB deals with its players? Even our simple method of building our team sucks so deeply. We avoid fielding our senior players for simple and foolish reasons; we fail to demonstrate loyalty to players when they are attacked by all and sundry, including the high and mighty JADCO; then we throw our new players into the game without the benefit of even one senior player’s wisdom or experience, and then we expect them to create history and bring back West Indies cricket.

I am terribly sorry for you, Jason Holder. If only I could be of any help.

Don McLeod

donmcleod.uee@gmail.com.

The dawn of a revolution

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Sunday morning, while lying in bed, I reflected on Saturday’s Survivor Empowerment March which I helped to organise. I was bombarded by myriad emotions. Several hours later, my feelings are largely unchanged.

My heart is bursting with much joy because for the first time, as Tanya Stephens said, I feel Jamaicans are truly fed up. I feel people are enraged and ready to do what’s needed to end the scourge of sexual violence and abuse against our women and girls. For the first time I felt completely safe walking through the city in a short shorts knowing that I had a militant army with me that was ready to protect and support if needs be.

I felt chills and held back tears as I watched survivors speak their truths. I stood in awe at the dawn of the revolution that’s coming – a revolution where women and girls will no longer be quiet, where they will no longer live in fear and subject themselves to accepting the status quo.

A revolution where the see and blind mentality is no more. A revolution where laws will call rape as it should be called – rape, and not sex with a person under 16. A revolution where survivors are no longer blamed and shamed for the act of their perpetrators, where their lives matter and their needs are prioritised over the individual(s) that abused them. A revolution where perpetrators will think twice before harassing a girl or a woman.

A revolution where justice is not just a figment of our imaginations; where justice is not unattainable but is a reality we can all enjoy, regardless of our age, the community we are from or live in, the work we do, the connections we have, the amount of money we have or who abused us.

As I stood there in my defiance to embrace my emotions I broke down as Shuga performed her song Ebony. “Weeping may endure for a night; rejoicing comes in the morning, soon we’ll be free...” Tears streamed down my face uncontrollably. I was saddened, hurt and angry. Angry at the women who paved the way before us. The ones who choose not to hold our hands on such a heart-rendering day. The ones who failed to realise that their efforts needed more, to accept that society was clamouring for a disruption that would re-energise all of us and respond to the many frightening stories of abuse of our girls and women.

As I thought about it, I wondered if they have ever experienced the weight of someone pressing against their body and forcing themselves onto and into them. Maybe they don’t know what it feels like to be raped at age 13 while being told “it’s our little secret” or “it’s okay, there’s nothing wrong with what I’m doing.”

Maybe they have never experienced a man forcing himself onto them while his hands lay tightly around their necks or covering their mouths. Maybe they have forgotten how harrowing this feels. Maybe they’ve moved on and forgotten their resolve. Then maybe, just maybe, they would understand my cry, our cry.

No one should have such experiences. I hope they will never have such an experience. I am committed to fight for every woman and girl out there who has been or continue to be raped and abused. I want to do all I can to stop men from destroying little girls’ lives.

Abby-Sade Brooks

sadeabby1@gmail.com

Tired of being shafted by Government

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

I remember when Audley Shaw made a big deal of the sale of the old Oceana Hotel for some $385 million which he, at the time, said was too low.

That, like many things in this country, was like a nine-day wonder. The auditor general (AG) has found that this may well have been the case, as the property was sold using a two-year-old valuation report and proper procedures were not followed in the sale. The UDC, which sold the property, is still adamant that it was a sensible and prudent sale, taking all the other factors into consideration. Those factors are yet to add up and make sense. The Government’s decision to lease the property and renovate a section to house the Accountant General’s Department (AGD) for some $400 million is my big contention, which has left me truly angered.

Why the hell do I always get the nasty end of the stick? Why do I have to now work very hard to clear this bill? There are so many questions to be answered.

An article published in the Jamaica Observer of March 13, 2017 entitled ‘AGD to pay rent after Gov’t spends $478m’ looks at just how stupid our government is when it comes to tax payers’ dollars. After spending over $400 million to renovate, the Government will spend a further $90 million per year to rent the space. How can this ever be prudent, sensible and above board? Something about this entire deal stinks.

These are the issues I expect watchdog groups to talk about. I expect the unions to raise concerns over this frivolous type of spending, as this is money that could be channelled elsewhere or spent in a more frugal way.

I have a few questions for the previous Administration which brokered this sweetheart deal: Who are the owners of the company that bought the building? Who are the financiers of the purchase? As per the AG’s report, certain regulations were not followed in the process of selling the property. who can be held accountable for this possible loss of revenue?

I also have some questions for the current Administration: with all the talk of transparency, why hasn’t this been a talking point, considering it is going to cost taxpayers millions in additional expenditure as per an article in the

Gleaner yesterday entitled ‘Government Department spends $76m on rent without moving in’, which shows that the country will be left with a hefty sum just moving into this building. This is incredulous!

Why should I be taxed to fund something like this? I have no road to drive on, no proper hospital to go to, few good public schools, zero social welfare benefits that I can utilise, not even a proper public park to take my children, yet I pay over 30 per cent PAYE, what do I have to show? I am tired of being shafted by the Government, all in an effort to assist a friend here and there. Do you recall Outameni? Somebody needs to be held accountable for this very smelly deal. Mr Holness, you are all about transparency, can you hold somebody accountable? Please.

Javid Brown

Negril

javidbrown@gmail.com

New Parliament building great for Kingston, but...

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

The decision to construct a new parliament building in Kingston sounds like a great project for the capital city. I hope it provides opportunities for local architects, who we were recently told had to leave Jamaica to get work.

Prime Minister Andrew Holness speaks regularly of the future, but what does this future hold for the development of the other parishes? Why not build some government offices in the other parishes? With modern communication systems available, what is preventing this geographical diversification of government offices?

Each parish should get a piece of the financial pie and that would foster development. Having all the government offices concentrated in Kingston and St Andrew is an acknowledgement that the other parishes nuh ready. They have been neglected over the years. This must change.

Members of parliament (MPs) from both political sides must stand up for their parishes and demand this kind of recognition and improvement, and not just be satisfied with the measly local development fund allocations.

It is time the Government, the parish councils and MPs advocate and work for their parishes’ development, and not just their party.

Norman Lee

Brampton, Ontario

namronlee@rogers.com

Stemming the illegal gun trade

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Successive Governments have demonstrated that they lack the political will to do what is necessary to stem the trade in illegal guns which we blame for the escalating crime wave. Our security forces make the same lame excuses, among them blaming our vast coastline, for not being able to manage. So I often wonder what advice they are giving to our Government.

We are told that the authorities know of “over 145 illegal ports” through which these illegal guns and ammunition come into the country. Security Minster Mr Montague is telling us, among other things, that: “The acquisition of the two ships for the JDF and the purchase of a surveillance aircraft will help to prevent guns and ammunition from entering the country,” and that “we must choke off the supply”, Really now!

Since we’re already identified 145 illegal ports, why not monitor all vessels leaving our shores? Would it not make sense, and be cheaper in the long run, to train and employ a corps of fish/game wardens and station them 24 hours at these ports, and have all our fishing boats register when they leave and return to port?

The wardens would give a tag to each boat on their departure. The boat operators would be required to keep the tag on-board in case they are intercepted by the coastguard or marine police, and return the tag when they get back to home port. The crew of any boat found without a tag or outside of designated areas must be arrested and the police must be called to investigate any boat crew whose whereabouts cannot be accounted for.

It does not take a rocket scientist or a foreigner to tell us how to solve this. Our legislators must do what is necessary and pass relevant legislation to combat this gun trade.

Authnel Reid

reidaut@icloud.com

A (black) night at the Oscars

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Despite the flub on Oscar night recently, when the final and most coveted award for Best Picture was announced incorrectly, nothing could take away from the significance of

Moonlight, the film which eventually won.

Not only was this a phenomenal movie with outstanding acting, script, directing, soundtrack, and excellent cinematography,

Moonlight became the first film featuring an all-black cast and director (Barry Jenkins) to be voted Best Picture by the Academy. The film received a total of eight nominations, winning three categories. This was an independent, low-budget film, reportedly the lowest budget for a Best Picture film — costing less than a 30-second commercial aired during the Oscars’ live telecast.

Of equal significance in the Best Picture category this year were two other films with black themes and casts, also outstanding

Hidden Figures and

Fences.

Moonlight, written by Barry Jenkins and Tarell Alvin McCraney, was based on McCraney’s previously unpublished play, tells the story of race, culture and sexuality as it follows a young black boy into adulthood, growing up in a volatile part of Miami. There are parallels with Jamaica and its culture of homophobia. Perhaps folks might think the Academy was ‘shoving gay down their throats’ this year, although this was the only film nominated in all the categories combined which touched the subject. Films can teach us a lot as we get to see things from a different angle. I hope many get to see this outstanding film.

Pete Delisser

pdelisser1988@yahoo.com



Try ‘ethical dons’

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

The solution to the guns entering the island is not so much in manpower and equipment. Just remember that Jamaica is an island, surrounded by water, and people and things can enter the country via every square foot around it, as stated by a minister some years ago. What we need is embedded intelligence all around to combat that.

Anecdotal evidence and allegations on the street suggest that certain criminal executive officers (CEO), called hereafter dons, would know about any/most guns or ammunition entering the country, and if you tried to go around him and he found out you would have to go in hiding — tek weh yuhself — for disrespecting or disregarding his management system. Now if a don can be so organised, it seems sadly that these CEOs/don could do a better job dealing with crime and criminals.

In effect, the police and the national security minister need to learn from the dons how to effectively police this country.

The Jamaica Observer has polls regularly; how about this one? Dons can be effective at crime control, or Dons should have a role in crime control, or any approved variation. My answer, I can tell you, is “YES”.

I think also that anecdotally Dudus was particularly impressive at management. Ask any police, higgler or shopper/housewife in Coronation Market, or citizen who worked or lived in these areas.

If there can be “ethical hackers”, why not “ethical CEOs/dons”? I am sure many would be proud to help their country. Prime Minister Andrew Holness, this is the thinking outside the box that you advocate. National Security Minister Robert Montague and Justice Minister Chuck, this has never been tried; you have nothing to lose, and what if it works? Jamaicans will support you.

Michael Spence

micspen2@hotmail.com


The power of people is stronger than the people in power

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Much praise should go to the indigenous people in America and the rest of the world who struggle to resist the forces of corporate power who threaten their land and very existence.

Natural law deems that the land and its resources exist to serve the needs of life and not the interests of those who worship at the altar of corporate profits.

The struggle of indigenous people is a part of the fight to save the planet. Eventually, they will prevail.



Victor A Dixon

Boynton Beach, Florida

victoradixon@

yahoo.com

Reach out to the Venezuela

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Jamaica continues to receive significant benefit from the PetroCaribe Fund. Quite recently, it was reported that several Jamaican students will receive scholarships totalling $30 million from this fund. The PetroCaribe Agreement has been described as one of the finest examples of political collaboration in Jamaica’s history. Jamaicans have benefited directly in a number of areas; namely education, funding to the Students’ Loan Bureau, and grants to finance projects aimed at improving the lives and welfare of the poor and vulnerable in our society. Indirectly, the agreement has stabilised our economy mainly with our balance of payments and exchange rate.

However, while Jamaica earns, Venezuela burns. Following the drastic reduction in world oil prices, and with oil accounting for approximately 90 per cent of Venezuela’s exports, their economy has seen an unprecedented economic meltdown. The latest economic reports show inflation in 2016 reaching 800 per cent and is expected to rise even higher. The country is now short on food and medical supplies.

Venezuela was a friend to Jamaica and other Caribbean countries in a time of need. At the time of the implementation of the PetroCaribe Agreement, world oil prices were trading astronomically high, threatening to destabilise many Caribbean economies. Several countries were already feeling the effects of the high oil prices. With the exception of Trinidad and Tobago, Caribbean countries rely on imported fuel to drive their economies.

In light of the present situation in Venezuela, Jamaica and the other PetroCaribe Agreement beneficiaries should reach out to the people of Venezuela who made significant sacrifices for us in our time of need. While a few countries may have individually reached out to Venezuela, in the context of the present situation, a collective response would be most appropriate.

While we may not be wealthy countries, it would be good for us to remember that “if you have a dollar, you have plenty to share”, and that “a friend in need is a friend indeed”.

Kemmehi Lozer

Kingston 5

k_lozer@yahoo.com

Have no fear, Peter’s here!

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

In the recent budget debate Dr Peter Phillips seems to have found himself and is now on his way forward to being the vibrant political and social mind he was supposed to have been.

Had he been stunted all these years by retrograde socio-economic and political thought processes that engulfed the People’s National Party since the 90s and onward, after the end of the Michael Manley era?

Prime Minister Andrew Michael Holness would be wise to give him a listening ear and adopt some of his advice and build on it.

Have no fear, Peter’s best bet is becoming an apolitical statesman in the People’s National Party to revive a progressive Jamaican institution, and perhaps make Jamaica great and prosperous again for all Jamaicans here and in the Diaspora.

Michael Spence

Liguanea PO

St Andrew

micspen2@hotmail.com

Let’s use social media responsibly

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Social media has undoubtedly revolutionised how we communicate in the 21st century. At the click of a button, we’re connected to a social media platform which displays a large variety of information about our friends, families, associates, current affairs, and basically everything that is happening in the world right now. Social media platforms, such as WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and

YouTube, have made connecting and disseminating information unbelievably easy for its users. Despite the many privileges that come with social media, there also exists a great responsibility that many do not adhere to.

In recent times, social media has become inundated with extremely graphic content, including videos and images of persons who have met their untimely demise, or other content that is quite disturbing. There is no sense of decency or tact that is displayed by some individuals sharing such offensive content. Did they even stop for a second to think about how the families of these victims feel when such devastating images are circulated on social media? The irresponsible use of social media has caused many of us to be very discourteous and tactless towards others.

At the rate at which disparaging content has immersed social media, there needs to be a tutorial to guide people how to properly use it. Instead of grabbing your phone to video someone fighting, try to break up the fight or get help from anyone who is capable of assisting. Instead of videoing someone in a car accident taking their very last breaths, call an ambulance or seek immediate assistance. Instead of posting discriminating memes to ridicule people and belittle their sense of well-being, show a little courtesy and respect. We cannot continue to inappropriately use social media and believe that it should be acceptable.

Social media has contributed significantly to how we communicate and express ourselves in today’s fast-moving society, but we must not allow ourselves to be carried away to a point where we compromise our integrity to gain several “likes”, “comments” or “shares” as a means of increasing online popularity.

Irresponsible use of social media has also been demonstrated by motorists who use the roadways daily. Several people are on their cellphones texting, Facebooking, tweeting, posting images on Instagram, checking e-mail, watching videos on YouTube. More concerningly, these motorists are engaging in these activities whilst other passengers are travelling in the vehicle. This shows blatant disregard and disrespect for other people’s lives. We must focus all of our attention on the roads when driving and not on our cellphones and the social media content that is there. Whatever is on the phone can definitely wait, our lives cannot. We should not allow ourselves to become so ostentatiously caught up in social media and controlled online content.

Greater responsibility and tact needs to be demonstrated by social media users when posting content, and also the consequences of posting certain content should also be taken into consideration. Social media can be fun, but it must also be conscientious.

O’Neil D Phipps

drphippsfortis@

gmail.com

Protect the NHT from future raids

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

As I struggle to be a progressive Jamaican, I do so without hope, pride and dignity. I am led to walk with my head searching the ground.

Who can bring us hope? Not the Jamaica Labour Party (JLP), and certainly not the People’s National Party (PNP).

The National Housing Trust (NHT) was created, no doubt, for the working class. But whether you earn minimum wage or among the elites you were given a chance to own your home by paying your share of dues. The PNP now has to be quiet as they are ashamed for having set the precedent for the JLP for pillaging the NHT. They were the first bandits that chose to remove funds from the NHT for purposes that had nothing to do with the providing of affordable homes.

The more I listen to their silly excuses after years of mismanagement, the more I wish as a nation we can muster the moral authority and force the true intention of Michael Manley to prevail and for his people to once again see their dreams and aspirations fulfilled.

Whom can we turn to now to save us?

We may have to strike a deal. Just to show you that we care about our country, take the money for this fiscal year, with the hope that you will create a better economy; then, pass a law that now prohibits anyone from utilising NHT funds.

Both the JLP and PNP have got a taste. The next government that even thinks of removing funds must be executed by the people, whose sweat and blood created the funds in the first place. That’s how serious poor people’s money must be taken.

Neville Grant

nevillejamrock@gmail.com

Viewing all 9214 articles
Browse latest View live