Quantcast
Channel: Jamaica Observer
Viewing all 9214 articles
Browse latest View live

Jamaica 50, now what?

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Many buildings are still draped in our national colours, but in true Jamaican style, we've already moved on. The 50th anniversary of our Independence was nothing more than another holiday. Some street hustlers picked up spare change selling flags to the periodically patriotic, and the rest of us just got drunk by the beach.

Succeeding governments have been directly responsible for the state of Jamaica's national treasures of our colonial past. For those unaware of the sustainable tourism thrust, it is an evolving form of tourism which places emphasis on those aspects of the culture and the physical environment which should be developed and protected. Paramount is the preservation of culture and the physical infrastructure as part of the national patrimony to be enjoyed into future surviving administrations.

Succeeding governments have been directly responsible for the state of Jamaica's national treasures of our colonial past. For those unaware of the sustainable tourism thrust, it is an evolving form of tourism which places emphasis on those aspects of the culture and the physical environment which should be developed and protected. Paramount is the preservation of culture and the physical infrastructure as part of the national patrimony to be enjoyed into future surviving administrations.

The Coke Methodist Church, the Ward Theatre, Port Royal, Emancipation Square, Colbeck Castle, and the old Attorney General's Chambers in downtown Kingston, just to name a few, are grand examples of colonial landmarks of our rich architectural past and examples of the beautiful landscape. They tell the stories of our immediate past: stories good, bad and indifferent. Not only are they imposing in sheer size, but also in beauty and the stories they bear.

As appalling as this assault on our built heritage is to conceive, it is but a single chapter in a long history of obliteration which cannot be blamed on any one person or Government. It is a reprehensible burden we must all bear as Jamaicans.

The basic argument which may be proffered for the fate of these national treasures is the "lack of funds and resources". Part of the problem stems from a lack of public education on the value of our heritage assets. The ministries of youth and culture and tourism must dedicate some of their limited resources to multiculturalism and arts, while partnering with the Ministry of Education to inculcate a sense of national pride in our past -- and not just our African past, but also our European, East Indian, Chinese, Syrian and Lebanese.

Those few public institutions dedicated to conservation have consistently failed in their mandates and seem quite happy to continue on their losing streaks while our past is trampled and lost. Jamaica unfortunately has no national museum to showcase our religious and cultural diversity. It pains me exceedingly to see the vast potential for public education and the deficiency of interest which is shown in preserving Jamaicans rich Jewish, Islamic, Hindu, Maroon, Rastafarian, and Baha'i heritage.

There is a Protection of National Monuments and Sites office, and the Heritage Research and Information Department within the Jamaica National Heritage Trust, and the Development and Promotion of Cultural Programmes within the Jamaica Cultural Development Commission. Had I not been aware of their presence I would have been as stunned, as most people, to learn that such high-minded departments could exist within the wreckage of our civil service. One only has to look at our architectural treasures and documentation of ethnic and religious minorities to see the impact of the departments on the landscape. The lack of zeal or even public acknowledgment of historically relevant events, such as Indian Arrival Day, Diwali, Eid al-Adha, Jewish Passover, et al, from successive governments towards preservation is really a reflection of a national mentality which frowns on minorities.

Our first culture minister in independent Jamaica and former prime minister, Edward Seaga, was, most ironically, an anthropologist, and is credited for groundbreaking research, promotion and preservation of Jamaica's folk heritage to the detriment of other minority groups. Yet, amid the muddle of destruction and ignorance, there are beacons of hope. For over a century, a small band of dedicated Jamicans calling themselves Hindus, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists and Maroons have been striving against gigantic odds of political obstacles and majority religious fundamentalists to raise the national consciousness of our heritage and to preserve their traditions and identity. We need to do more than just preserve stories about supernatural folk creatures. We need to archive our herbal remedies, all our religious ceremonies and customs from birth to death. There should be concerted efforts to make sure we keep the memory of old sayings, of traumatic events, of hardship and turmoil, and of regional variances.

The Sunday Gleaner on April 21, 2013, in an article entitled 'Jamaica, Guyana Top Sustainable Tourism Award' stated, "National Trust of Guyana took home the Heritage Protection Award for its work in preserving and promoting the nation's patrimony in protection of the country's heritage." Those of us familiar with Guyana admire and laud the people's and successive governments' appreciation and commitment to not only the promotion and preservation of national treasures, but also exposure of its citizenry to its religious and cultural diversity. Beyond collecting and preserving the narrative of our past, we should also be proud of it. As a former colony, we have a tendency to look outside. This is powerfully demonstrated in the way we treat our environment and minorities, and how we interact in our communities.

I appeal to the relevant authorities to take a vested interest in preservation, lest all be lost too soon.

Andrew King

abking020@gmail.com

Jamaica 50, now what?

-->

Euthanasia, an abuse against life

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

In 2002, Belgium's lawmakers ushered in a law on euthanasia. A law incited by Holland. In both countries the process was controversial due to the opposition that it had to endure.

Professor of the University of Hull (United Kingdom), Raphael Cohen-Almagor, has done a research published in the journal Issues in Law & Medicine. This reviews the historical causes and legal developments, as well as the repeated abuses against life.

The investigation, with dozens of hours of interviews with prominent doctors in the country, and the reflections of 15 years of travel for the main policlinics of Belgium, England, United States, Canada, Holland, Australia, and New Zealand give us the conclusion that: "According to the testimony of heads of department and ethics committees, patients cling to life at all costs. Most of them want to die because they are afraid to suffer. However, when doctors control the pain, many of those who expressed the wish to die change their attitude and want to continue living."

Medical indication and adherence to deontological codes are pressing demands. "The challenge of doctors is to use properly their influence on patients". In effect, "doctors have to be aware of the enormous role that their advice can have on the treatment chosen by their patients".

Thus, the main proposal of the reseacher has been verified. Additionally, the conclusions made say that euthanasia is an outdated and integrated matter in hospitals of the country, and that there is much to be done so that law enforcement is not misleading.

Now, the extension of euthanasia to infants and elderly people with mental injuries as well as those with cancer or schizophrenia is being discussed in Belgium. Now, accepting that disabled people do not deserve to live is the next step to approving euthanasia.

Euthanasia is a grave abuse of God's law because it is a deliberate and morally unacceptable destruction of a human being.

Clemente Ferrer

antonio@aplicaciones.info

Euthanasia, an abuse against life

-->

Protect the Jamaican species

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Based on the information on the Department of Statistics' website, Jamaica's birth rate in 2006 was 17.37 per 1,000 and in 2011 15.23 per 1,000 people in the population. This data is showing a decreasing trend in birth since 2006. The death rate, however, shows an overall increase. In 2006 it was 6.13 as against 6.61 in 2011. And migration also increased; 2006 was 6.42 as against 6.58 in 2011.

In the six years, 2006 to 2011, our nation has been adding approximately 44,000 people per year. And approximately 1.1 million of the population is between the ages of 35 and 75 plus years old.

In the six years, 2006 to 2011, our nation has been adding approximately 44,000 people per year. And approximately 1.1 million of the population is between the ages of 35 and 75 plus years old.

It seems to me that in another six years, all things remaining constant, over 400,000 Jamaicans will move into the 35 to 75 plus year-old groups, whilst less than the 263,260 births will be registered.

Some countries in the world are relaxing their immigration requirements, particularly to entice young, educated and skilled people to assist in their building processes, which adds even more to the depletion of our human resources and skills.

We can be wilfully blind and not give any attention to this phenomenon, or we can creatively harvest the skills of our young, educated people to provide answers to the problems we face in industry, technology, development, research, and export competitiveness. We must find ways to keep them gainfully employed in Jamaica.

Suggestions about forcing people to take family planning are not only ill-informed and ridiculous, but if implemented, would be against our rights as human beings. Even if we needed to reduce our birth rate dramatically, which in my view we do not, the proven best strategy is to empower our females. Give them training, jobs, increased status, especially considering that they are at least 50 per cent of the population, and most of their income goes towards looking after their children and households.

We need to take better care of our children; this can only redound to the further development of the society. It is not beyond us to look after them. The State must lead and set the example.

Carlton Stewart

stewart.carlton@gmail.com

Protect the Jamaican species

-->

'Iron Dog' is a super man

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

Well, he may not have won the fight. He may not have lived up to the expectation he influenced so many boxing fans to develop, but one thing is for sure: Miguel Haye's bark has driven lots of excitement into the heart and soul of those who follow the sport.

His antics, whether justified or not, were enough to fuel the enthusiasm of so many of us who either made our way to the Chinese Benevolent Centre (CBC) or, in my case, lit the barbecue grill, chilled a few beers, and invited friends over to see the Iron Dog "eat a food".

'Iron Dog', better known in his hometown as Superman, single-handedly took boxing to a new level in Jamaica by drawing attention to a sport which, prior to the Wray & Nephew Contender Series, was dying a slow death. This man had heart, personality, passion and bravery, lacking only a few good punches and a perfect ring stance.

He should return, in fact, if the winner was to be selected by public voting as in Digicel Rising Stars, Iron Dog would win this tournament "paws down", such is the popularity of this St Mary hero... yes! A St Mary him come from!

My hope is that the excitement brewing over the Contender will drive a lot more youth back into the gym. If this happens, then over time the fans at the CBC should see some better quality fights — certainly fights going beyond the second round.

The bout may not have lasted for more than two rounds, but the name Iron Dog will be remembered for a long time to come. Iron Dog should return next year, only then he should be called Superman.

Paul Wallace

Superpaul4u@yahoo.com

'Iron Dog' is a super man

-->

Independence for Portland

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

In response to a letter entitled "Portland ostracised", which was published in the Jamaica Observer of Thursday, April 25, I am proposing that we Portlanders start thinking seriously of seceding from the rest of Jamaica.

Portland, with a size of 814 square km and a population of 83,000, is almost twice the size of Barbados and has less than one-third the population of that country.

With a low population and increased productivity, Portlanders could have one of the highest GDP per capita in the world. We could increase this low population with retirees, highly skilled professionals and investors. We could develop the best tourism product in the Caribbean.

Portland has a marina and ports for cruise ships and commercial vessels. We could expand the current airfield at St Margaret's Bay to make it into an international airport.

We have beautiful rivers, falls, lagoons, lush green forests, parks, and one of the best coffees in the world. In addition, since the 1950s, more than 700 films have featured Portland.

We could combine all of these and more to attract more than three million tourists a year. Eventually, education could be free to all Portlanders up to the secondary level. We could promote family life and discourage materialism. We could have a very efficient public transportation system.

On the matter of crime, Portland already has some of the most honest and hard-working police in Jamaica. With better training, higher pay and better working conditions, Portland could have one of the lowest crime rates in the world.

Nothing in this letter is hard to achieve. Let us isolate ourselves from the rest of Jamaica and survive.

Howard Rennis

rehnis@msn.com

Independence for Portland

-->

Protect the sun-lights

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

I wish to publicly condemn the recent theft of the 53 batteries from the solar-lighting system along the Highway 2000 corridor.

These solar-powered lights were the latest, state-of-the-art upgrades that were introduced to help the country reduce its annual cost to generate electricity.

This wholesale theft of these batteries further handicaps Jamaica and keeps us further way from modernising.

I propose that, going forward, the Government:

1. explores purchasing units that don't stick out as solar-powered lights.

2. not publicise the installation of additional units.

3. if possible, embed tracking devices in these units to assist if, god forbid, they are again stolen.

4. provide effective police patrol, and lighting no less, in areas where these lights are installed.

5. gives the courts the power to throw the book at anyone caught and convicted of stealing these batteries, and so send a strong message that this will not be tolerated.

By this we should deter future theft of these energy and money-saving units, which Jamaica desperately needs to help wean ourselves off of the petroleum addiction.

Patrick Callum

patrickcallum@yahoo.com

People Power — A People Powerless

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

With the decision by the People's National Party (PNP) Government to retain embattled Member of Parliament Richard Azan in his post as junior minister in the Ministry of Transport, Works and Housing — at least until the outcome of the OCG report they say — the party once again shows that it will continue to do whatever it wants to do, with no regard to what is considered right.

Sadly, I can't say I'm surprised. The examples of the PNP flexing its political muscles and shoving out its chest at anyone who dares to challenge the party are mounting rapidly, with less than a year and a half in office. They range from:

- the flag controversy last year with Montego Bay Mayor Glendon Harris at the swearing-in ceremony for councillors.

- the super-imposed image of the education minister on the national flag for use as material for students (printing error excuse notwithstanding).

- the controversial NHT $45.6-billion drawdown, which even saw the law of the land amended with urgency to facilitate this move.

- ignoring cries from near-everybody for government ministers to take a pay cut and/or shave the size of the "wardrobe"

- the recent saga with the renaming of the Cornwall Regional Hospital in honour of Dr Eldemire

and this list is not exhaustive, even when you add this whole Richard Azan saga.

Where does it end? To what lengths will this Government go? What will they do next? The Opposition seems to be on the other side of the fence barking like a toothless dog, seemingly powerless to stop the behemoth citizens let loose by voting, or not voting, in the last round of elections. It is almost as if we are living in a democratically communist country. I've never heard of that term, but such appears to be the nature of what is unfolding.

To me, it appears that the "Comrade for life" bond is so strong, that this Government appears not to have an objective bone in its structure. It seems as if it's always party first. If after all this colleague MPs can still find the grace to look in each other's eyes I shudder to think what will be next.

Might as well change the maxim from "People Power" to "People In Power".

Double A

St Andrew

People Power -- A People Powerless

-->

Give Eldemire is due

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

The position being taken by Mayor Harris of Montego Bay is based on treatment of Dr Herbert Eldemire (now deceased), former minister of health in the Government of the 1960's, as a bystander in the establishment of the Cornwall Regional Hospital (CRH).

I was Minister of Finance in the late 1960's when a submission on the CRH was laid before Cabinet for approval. As is the practice, the comments of the Ministry of Finance must be included in the submission. The comments, which I put forward, as minister, was that the proposal for the CRH was too expensive and could not be afforded nor could some of the high-tech equipment be operated by local medical staff.

However, after a strong plea that the CRH was to serve the region and would require size to grow and equipment for serious medical treatment, Cabinet approved the proposal.

This would not have been the case had Dr Eldemire not forcefully pressed for the establishment of the Cornwall Regional Hospital.

All credit should go to Dr Eldemire instead of undermining his legacy.

Edward Seaga

Office of the Distinguished Fellow

University of the West Indies

Mona Campus

Kingston 7

Give Eldemire is due

-->

Tablets in Parliament?

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

When I read about the tablets being given to sitting parliamentarians by the minister of science, technology, energy, and mining, I was a bit confused. Perhaps the minister was dispensing some specially made pharmaceutical to parliamentarians in need of a booster dose to enhance their performance and mental capacity? Then I found out it was tablet computers.

The minister, according to reports, extracted more than $800 million to buy 20,000 tablets for parliamentarians and 30 public schools.

Now, tablets are small and portable flat personal computing devices, mostly used by people on the go. For a school, a laptop or even desktop would be more effective, I think. For instance, how will the minister protect against theft of these very portable devices in the public schools using them? And, why give out free tablets to parliamentarians who can afford to buy their own? What a waste!

E-Learning is so much more than tablets, and the minister must have been poorly advised. This is another example of a measure of fiscal irresponsibility, if you ask me. Reminds me of the very loose lightbulb project.

According to the report I read, the minister "appeared to electrify the Parliament when he announced that low-performing institutions would be blessed with the tablets, free of cost, to brighten the prospects of students in these public schools in the coming year, and to start with a pilot project following the completion of E-Learning". Whoever thought tablets could become a blessing? The text of the minister's presentation "fuelling for growth", we understand, was also placed on the free tablets for parliamentarians to take home and read. What a joke! If nothing else, electrifying must be the essence of this particular ministry.

P Chin

chin_p@yahoo.com

Tablets in Parliament?

-->

The value of the Multi-modal Transport Hub

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

I noted your editorial last Thursday regarding tourists from China, which, coincidentally, could have been extended to the Far East in general, and Africa.

Indeed, this was a part of the Integrated Multi-modal Transport Hub that I, as transport minister, was creating as part of the plans for growth that I laid out in April 2011.

Anyone in the travel and visitor business will confirm that travel time of the visitor (point-to-point) is among the greatest challenges, as is the load factor of the route. This is why my plan spoke to the development of Vernamfield in the long term, and the expansion of the Sangster International Airport, together with the expansion of the Ian Fleming Airport, to create a Caribbean Regional Hub.

This would facilitate travellers from across numerous time zones, to reach more than one destination in a relatively quick time.

Then there is the route factor, which was why I pursued the 'Open Skies' policy, and left some 26 such agreements in place, as the present routes taking travellers through either Europe or the USA both require visas, which take time and add in-transit costs.

As we all know, the visitor market is a time-sensitive one. Thus, I had all but put in place plans to have Far Eastern airlines fly from the Far East and Africa (China, Malaysia, Singapore, Ghana, South Africa and Nigeria) to Kingston. This could be achieved in some 17-19 hours with one change, in comparison to the present three to four days and even weeks awaiting a visa.

The result would be that the volume of travellers would far exceed the capacities of our existing airports until we are able to build out Vernamfield to take the larger planes. Couple that situation with reduced visa rules, and 'bingo!', we would be overwhelmed even if we only attract a fraction of one per cent of that overall population.

Only by long-term planning can we advance, and nothing has happened while almost two years have passed by, as we haggle over different political fantasies and the International Monetary Fund.

Mike Henry

Member of Parliament

Central Clarendon

The value of the Multi-modal Transport Hub

-->

Renewable energy: Do we have the will?

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

With over 90 per cent of all energy used in Jamaica derived from imported oil, the country is left susceptible and vulnerable to the variation of world oil prices, which seem to be always going up.

We have been here before and we must learn from history. In the 1970s when oil prices basically quadrupled, Jamaica's oil import bill jumped by a massive 172 per cent between 1973 and 1974. Subsequent to that, successive governments have done little or nothing to address our thirst for the black gold.

Consequently, the Jamaican consumer, and indeed the Government, have been struggling under the ever-increasing and stifling cost of energy.

The cash-strapped Government currently doles out J$14 billion per year for its electricity bill and is only now trying to reduce that by implementing conservation methods. However, conservation, though necessary, cannot by itself solve the energy problem.

Renewable energy is the sexy phrase being tossed around as a solution. Indeed, the GOJ has stated that renewable energy should represent 20 per cent of the total energy mix [in Jamaica] by 2030 and has subsequently released an RFP for 115MW to be added to the grid by 2016.

Countries such as Iceland, Albania, Paraguay and Lesotho, to name a few, have renewables in their total energy mix exceeding 80 per cent. The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that in 2008, 10 per cent of the world's energy consumption was from renewable energy sources. EIA forecasts that by 2035 consumption of renewable energy will be about 14 per cent of total world energy consumption. Simply put, renewable energy is a bona fide solution to Jamaica's

energy problem.

Jamaica is endowed with significant renewable energy resources, but the country has been slow in harnessing this potential to create a vibrant and productive renewable energy sector. The indicators on the extent of the

gap between our renewable

energy potential and implementation are noteworthy:

* Jamaica enjoys over 300 days of sunlight per year, but the use of solar power remains marginal.

* To date, Jamaica has only one major wind farm implementation (Wigton).

* Despite estimates that Jamaica has about 100MW of geothermal power, there has been very little interest in exploiting this source.

* Jamaicans produce waste at a first-world rate, yet despite interest by developers, there has yet to be a waste-to-energy programme.

* The island has 120 rivers, with several that are suitable for hydroelectricity power generation. However, to date, there are only eight hydroelectric plants in Jamaica, all owned by JPS.

We clearly have the resources with which to make the renewable energy sector as close to a panacea as possible for our energy crisis. We simply cannot continue in a scenario where the money we pay to import oil is more than what we earn from exports. So the real question is, do we have the will?

Andrew Dennis

Hibiscus Drive, Barbican

Kingston 8

@theDennergy

Renewable energy: Do we have the will?

-->

Thank you all

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

I am grateful for the privilege and opportunity you afforded me to use this medium to highlight my story in the Sunday Observer of April 14.

The story brought back memories of the accident in 1979, the pain which I have had to go through since then, and the low sum of around $300 per month which I am getting from the Ministry of Finance.

I extend my thanks to Mr Helps, who interviewed me and wrote the story, the photographer Mr Wellington and the other members of the Jamaica Observer who took time out to visit my home and do the story on me.

To your dedicated readers at home and abroad, your comments are noted and appreciated. I extend my deepest gratitude and thanks to you all and to those who did not have an opportunity to state their views publicly, I also thank you.

There is a pain in my right hand now, which has resulted from a tear in the rotator cuff musculator of the left shoulder and a left carpal tunnel syndrome.

This recent diagnosis is unfortunately a surgical problem, which will further impede me, as I have no right hand to assist myself, during the period of recovery, if surgery is undertaken.

Regrettably, surgery is the only reasonable option, which will cost over $400,000.

Astley Smith

Albion

St Thomas

Thank you all

-->

Call him Chris 'Machine Gun' Gayle

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

We have seen in the Bible that at times people and places were given special names.

For example, in the Book of Genesis, Chapter 32, when Jacob wrestled with the angel, his name was changed from Jacob to Israel. And the name of the place was also called Peneil.

A name is a part of the identification scenario; and a nickname has a meaning behind it. Names, therefore, are very important.

Former West Indies batting star Vivian Richards was named the 'Master Blaster' because of his explosive dominance in the game of cricket. That name fitted him well.

Now, looking at another rising star — a genius of explosive display — Chris Gayle, what should we call him?

I propose 'Machine Gun' or 'Thunder Bolt' because when he hits the ball, it's well-hit, and shoots like a bullet from an M16 rifle.

He is a great entertainer who is merciless in his onslaught on bowlers.

I wish Chris Gayle further success in his cricketing career and that he will continue to play the game until he is 40 years old.

Good luck, 'Mr Machine-Gun'. Thank you for the great entertainment you are giving us, cricket lovers. Continue to draw big crowds.

Donald J Mckoy

donaldmckoy2010@yahoo.com

Call him Chris 'Machine Gun' Gayle

-->

Thatcher 101

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

I was one year old when the flamboyant character of Margaret Thatcher left the House of Commons in 1992.

I first came across the name Thatcher in an 'A' Level Literature tutorial in 2007. That very evening I started my research and reading on this great political icon. Her death now feels like a personal loss.

Mrs Thatcher will be remembered for her tough stance against the striking coal miners -- forcing them to return to work after nearly a full year of strike action, and also for her strident advocacy of free-market policies which consequently led to greater income inequality between the rich and the poor.

She was fiercely anti-Communist and found common cause with former United States President Ronald Reagan, who once described her as the "best man in England". Mrs Thatcher will also be remembered for the decision she took of sending in British troops and warships, in 1982, into the disputed British overseas territory, the Falkland Islands. She, along with Reagan, could be considered the two main architects in the anti-Communist crusade, which eventually led to the dismantling of the Soviet Union and the destruction of the Berlin Wall that followed shortly afterwards. Because of her toughness, she was described as "the Iron Lady of Britain".

In hindsight, however, 'Thatcherism' in England failed to address the burning issues of unemployment and skewed income distribution. If anything, there are today much higher levels of unemployment, cuts in social spending, and greater income inequality.

Lady Thatcher was made a baroness after she relinquished her seat in the House of Commons in 1992, and continued to sit in the House of Lords until ill health forced her to withdraw from public life entirely in 2002. She took a country that had lost faith in itself and gave it a long and hard slapping. In the end, she left the United Kingdom in a much better position than when she was first elected in 1979. Indeed, her career had a dark lust about it. It came from ancient British history, not ordinary politics. Like a Shakespearian tragedy, when a great figure topples, poetry points us to this personality. The same traits that raise them up now, bring them down... and that was how the lady went.

Andrew King

abking020@gmail.com

Thatcher 101

-->

Euthanasia balanced

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

I write in reference to an article published in the Jamaica Observer of April 26, 2013, entitled 'Euthanasia, an abuse against life'.

I am deeply appalled at the era in which we live and how cruel and heartless we have become.

The part that got me really furious was "now, the extension of euthanasia to infants and elderly people with mental injuries as well as those with cancer or schizophrenia is being discussed in Belgium".

Now, tell me, whose decision is it to determine whether someone should live or die? The hearts of men have indeed become as cold as ice, or even worse.

As someone with a loved one suffering from schizophrenia, I do not see a sick person as having a lesser right to life than anybody else; neither do any of the abovementioned persons to whom they are contemplating administering their stupid "solution". None of the said illnesses are instant death sentences, as persons with those illnesses are able to live a normal life just like everyone else.

Now, what if the masses decide to administer said treatment to them?

After all, they are the ones who have seemingly gone crazy.

Sobrena D Anderson

St Thomas

Euthanasia balanced

-->

What is in the best interest of the child?

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

A society can be measured by the way it treats its most vulnerable. The three groups that are most vulnerable in any society are: the elderly and infirm, the young and the mentally ill.

For our purpose, vulnerable is the susceptibility of certain groups to physical, emotional, and/or sexual injury. Having established who are considered vulnerable within our society, there can be no contest that these individuals should be highly cared for and protected based on their levels of vulnerability.

However, for the short period of time that I have been exposed to the school system, it has shown that there is little regard to children sometimes. Countless cases of verbal abuse and sexual abuse are reported on a regular basis, and I imagine much goes unreported.

Children are being denied freedom of expression and this may hinder the child's positive growth and development. It therefore begs the question, what are the rights of a child?

There are so many organisations that claim they are for the best interest of the child, and when we go to the media the things we hear happening to our children are more than outrageous. Is it that we have totally neglected those that will become the future of our society? What really is the best interest of the child?

The Child Care and Protection Act is up for review pretty soon. One will anticipate that the reviews will include more penalties for those who are found guilty of contravention of the rights of the child.

For too long we have sat down and quietly allowed our children to become victims of sexual, physical and verbal abuse. We must report these cases, if known, to the necessary authorities for their quick and strong action.

The reports of the various crimes against our children have been alarming, and we can tell by the frequency of reports in the media.

A search reveals signicantly high numbers of cases of crimes against children that make it into the court system.

What kind of society are we living in? How is it that so many of our children are impacted negatively by other members of the society? It is time to hold people accountable for these actions. Enough of the "pretty talk"; it is time to start doing real work in the interest of our children.

Jason Madden

SRHR Youth Advocate

What is in the best interest of the child?

-->

Separate wheat from tares

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

We must stop relaxing or abandoning our moral standards and ethical principles in order to please different sets of people who are hell-bent on having their own way, while expecting others to extend and treat them as if they had not committed an offence to what is the normal of the majority.

With that said, high schools are designed to educate, nurture, and guide children into becoming adults. It was not, and should not become, designed to accommodate and encourage adult activities and lifestyles such as walking around on the school compound in front of children with big pregnant bellies. That would not be sending good signals to those children within the school who have decided to be and act like children until they graduate.

Yes, I know that every pregnant schoolgirl will have a schoolboy who got her pregnant, providing that she wasn't having sex with an adult. However, the one who has the big belly walking around the school will be the one the other children will definitely know was acting like an adult. On the other hand, the one who got that someone pregnant will not have anything obvious carrying around the school for other children to know that he was not acting like a child. Hence, the schoolboy has no overt contribution in the tarnishing of the school's moral standards and ethical principles as would the schoolgirl -- unless, of course, the school decides to announce what the boy did to the entire school population.

I always say that the one who is visibly going to be seen carrying a child for nine months, because of biology, must be the one who pays far more attention to who that individual has sex with, and has a greater duty to take preventative steps to avoid negative consequences, such as teenage pregnancy. In this case, the females are those such persons.

I am not saying that she should not continue her education after she gives birth to her child, but what I am saying is that she should do so in another school. In that new environment the students do not have to know abut her missteps.

The schoolboy who got her pregnant, however, should not be unscathed. While dismissal from the school is not the answer, he should be made to understand that he will have to start sacrificing many of his childhood privileges in order to be a father to his child, and this includes things like reducing his lunch money and allowance in order to assist the parents of that schoolgirl to maintain the child.

Also, a system should be in place that keeps track of, and mandates that the schoolboy continues to care for his child after he has graduated from high school. His tertiary educational opportunities could also be delayed or the method extended until the girl he got pregnant has successfully made it through the secondary educational system at that other school.

That is my take on it. Deviance must be dealt with as visibly as the deeds committed and the school population is to understand that it is not OK, but rather a misdeed.

Garth 'Sub-Zero' Allen

excellentsub@hotmail.com

Separate wheat from tares

-->

Time for fixed traffic fines

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

It is my considered opinion that the existing provisions giving the police the power of imposing fine and exercising discretion in this connection is absolutely unconstitutional. And by necessary implication, it is a usurpation of the powers and duties of the judiciary.

I am, therefore, suggesting that the powers that be fix fines in respect of each ticketable offence payable at the tax office.

Owen S Crosbie

Mandeville

Manchester

oss@cwjamaica.com

Time for fixed traffic fines

-->

What about us in the basic schools?

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

It is with great dissapointment that I write this letter on behalf of myself and the many basic school teachers in Jamaica.

On Thursday, April 25, 2013 most teachers were not paid their regular salaries, including the subsidy teachers in the basic schools. Up to Sunday, April 28, 2013 we checked the ABMs in hope of seeing our subsidy; still no subsidy, and no one to say why we have not been paid.

This is totally disrespectful to us as teachers.

It makes me wonder if the persons responsible for paying our subsidy have a conscience.

To make matters worse and unbearable, most of the basic schools have more than one trained teacher, even though only one trained teacher is being paid by the ministry. The other trained teachers have to live by the meagre subsidy.

The Early Childhood Commission needs to understand that we have families and bills to take care of. It is high time consideration be made for the other trained teachers in the basic schools. We cannot live on the meagre subsidy of $23,500 a month.

Dissapointed Teacher

St Catherine

What about us in the basic schools?

-->

Where's the common in Commonwealth?

$
0
0
Dear Editor,

How is it that two foreign ministers from two English-speaking countries can take almost diametrically opposed positions regarding Sri Lanka's selection to host the CHOGM in November?

Shouldn't they be speaking with one voice on what the Commonwealth Charter says about upholding democratic values and ideals and the norms of good governance?

Why then is it that the Canadian foreign minister maintains the decision to allow Sri Lanka to host despite its appalling human rights record being tantamount to "accommodating evil"?

He said Canada is therefore likely to boycott it, because Canada has not joined the Commonwealth to accommodate evil, but to combat it. However, the Australian foreign minister, on the other hand, is adamant that boycotting is "counterproductive"; maintaining that "our challenge is to keep the pressure on to see further improvements" made by Sri Lanka.

We have witnessed how the pressure Senator Bob Carr talks about has not moved the Fiji military government one inch away from its Machiavellian plan to hang on to power via its bogus "roadmap to democracy"— which intelligent foreign state officials like Mr Carr have gullibly accepted as genuine.

Now the Commonwealth Secretary-General Kamlesh Sharma wants us to believe that Sri Lanka is sincere about reforming its human rights regime.

Even the former Australian PM Malcolm Fraser and over a dozen prominent Australians have not bought that, and are calling on Canberra to boycott unless there was significant progress on Sri Lanka's human rights record.

All this tells us one thing: something is clearly not right in the castle of the Commonwealth.

Rajen Naidu

Sydney

Australia

Where's the common in Commonwealth?

-->
Viewing all 9214 articles
Browse latest View live