Dear Editor,
I thought — based on hazy, old memories from working in a courts office — that once a case is before the court and not finally disposed of it was sub judice (Latin sound of the second word is like the combination of two female names, Judy and Kaye) and thus ought not to be commented on in the press.
Well, if this is still so, why did academic lawyer Matondo Mukulu break the rule in his criticism of a ruling by a Supreme Court judge and, further, why did The Gleaner publish his criticism?
For Christians who, like me, are troubled about the court’s decision regarding our beloved brother and friend, Pastor Al Miller, we have to heed the description of Mary in the Bible and prayerfully “ponder these things in our hearts” and obey the injunction to Liza in the folk song and “kibba yu mout”.
Clinton Chisholm (Rev)
clintchis@yahoo.com
I thought — based on hazy, old memories from working in a courts office — that once a case is before the court and not finally disposed of it was sub judice (Latin sound of the second word is like the combination of two female names, Judy and Kaye) and thus ought not to be commented on in the press.
Well, if this is still so, why did academic lawyer Matondo Mukulu break the rule in his criticism of a ruling by a Supreme Court judge and, further, why did The Gleaner publish his criticism?
For Christians who, like me, are troubled about the court’s decision regarding our beloved brother and friend, Pastor Al Miller, we have to heed the description of Mary in the Bible and prayerfully “ponder these things in our hearts” and obey the injunction to Liza in the folk song and “kibba yu mout”.
Clinton Chisholm (Rev)
clintchis@yahoo.com